Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search?

S I Shih1, G Sperling

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, England.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|June 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of glyceryl glucoside on AQP3 expression, barrier function and hydration of human skin.

Skin pharmacology and physiology·2012
Same author

A study of the pathogenesis of chronic pulmonary disease (bronchiectasis) of old rats.

Journal of gerontology·2010
Same author

Bone growth in normal and retarded growth rats.

Journal of gerontology·2010
Same author

Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2001
Same author

Sensitive calibration and measurement procedures based on the amplification principle in motion perception.

Vision research·2001
Same author

Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP streams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship.

Perception & psychophysics·2001
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

This study reveals that selective attention guides visual search to specific locations rather than filtering perceptual input. Focusing on a feature directs attention spatially, impacting search efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Understanding selective attention is crucial for explaining how the brain processes complex visual information.
  • Previous models debated whether attention filters perception or guides search.
  • Disentangling perceptual filtering from location selection remains a challenge in visual attention research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the mechanisms of selective attention in visual search.
  • To differentiate the roles of perceptual filtering versus spatial selection.
  • To determine how attention to feature values influences search performance.

Main Methods:

  • A novel paradigm combining attentional cuing and rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP).
  • Observers searched superimposed visual arrays with alternating target numerals and distractor letters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Attention was manipulated via instructions, probabilities, and payoffs, focusing on size and color features.

    • Main Results:

    • When attention provided only temporal information (Experiment 1), no attentional costs or benefits in accuracy were observed.
    • When attention indicated a unique spatial location (Experiment 2), consistent attentional costs and benefits emerged.
    • Selective attention to a feature did not exclude or admit items based on that feature.

    Conclusions:

    • Selective attention primarily acts by guiding search to specific spatial locations.
    • Attention does not operate through perceptual exclusion or admission of features.
    • The findings support a spatial guidance model of visual attention over a perceptual filtering model.