Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mentally disabled research subjects. The enduring policy issues

R Dresser1

  • 1School of Law, case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.

JAMA
|July 3, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Adults with mental disabilities require ethical research standards. Capacity assessments and proxy consent are crucial, with objectors rarely included in studies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Research subjects' voices: the missing element in research ethics.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2015
Same author

Preferences for return of incidental findings from genome sequencing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.

Clinical genetics·2015
Same author

A MODIFIED METHOD OF OBTAINING LARGE AMOUNTS OF RICKETTSIA PROWAZEKI BY ROENTGEN IRRADIATION OF RATS.

The Journal of experimental medicine·2009
Same author

Weighing the benefits of new Alzheimer's treatments.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2007
Same author

Dementia research: ethics and policy for the twenty-first century.

Georgia law review (Athens, Ga. : 1966)·2004
Same author

Procreation and punishment.

The Hastings Center report·2003

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Clinical Research Ethics
  • Neuroscience Research

Background:

  • Mentally disabled adults are frequently research subjects for various conditions.
  • US regulatory policy inadequately addresses ethical challenges in this research area.
  • Investigators and institutional review boards (IRBs) must establish specific standards for studies involving adults with mental disabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline ethical procedures for research involving adults with mental disabilities.
  • To enhance subject autonomy and accurately assess decision-making capacity.
  • To guide researchers, IRBs, and policymakers in protecting vulnerable populations.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current US regulatory policy and ethical guidelines.
Keywords:
Belmont ReportBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchMental Health TherapiesNational Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of ethical issues in research with decisionally incapable adults.
  • Recommendations for capacity assessment, information disclosure, and proxy decision-making.

    • Main Results:

    • Current policies are insufficient for addressing ethical complexities.
    • Enhanced capacity assessment and clear information disclosure are vital.
    • Proxy decision-makers need explicit guidance on ethical responsibilities.
    • Inclusion of decisionally incapable adults who object to research should be rare.

    Conclusions:

    • Collaboration among researchers, IRBs, advocacy groups, and federal officials is essential.
    • Consensus on risk-benefit evaluation and risk limits for studies without direct benefit is needed.
    • Representation of subject populations in research planning and review is recommended.