Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and

F E Harrell1, K L Lee, D B Mark

  • 1Division of Biometry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|February 28, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of obesity on outcome of unrelated cord blood transplant in children with malignant diseases.

Bone marrow transplantation·2010
Same author

Unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation in children with immune deficiency: results of a multicenter study.

Bone marrow transplantation·2009
Same author

Relation between baseline risk and treatment decisions in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: an examination of international practice patterns.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2005
Same author

Penalized maximum likelihood estimation to directly adjust diagnostic and prognostic prediction models for overoptimism: a clinical example.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2004
Same author

Time-based risk assessment after myocardial infarction. Implications for timing of discharge and applications to medical decision-making.

European heart journal·2003
Same author

American College of Cardiology key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee).

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2001
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Accurate clinical outcome prediction requires careful model validation. This study details methods to assess regression model fit and predictive accuracy, crucial for reliable survival analysis and avoiding overfitting.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Research Methodology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Multivariable regression models are essential for clinical outcome studies.
  • These models handle mixed variable types and censored data but risk poor fit or inaccurate predictions if un critically applied.
  • Assessing model fit and predictive accuracy is vital, especially for survival data with censoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss methods for measuring regression model fit and predictive accuracy.
  • To highlight the importance of unbiased validation techniques like bootstrapping or cross-validation.
  • To present a modeling strategy that mitigates common pitfalls in regression analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of an interpretable index for predictive discrimination.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Methods for assessing the calibration of predicted survival probabilities.
  • Application of bootstrapping or cross-validation for unbiased validation.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified hazards associated with poorly fitted and overfitted regression models.
    • Demonstrated the utility of specific validation techniques for survival data.
    • Illustrated methods using a prostate cancer survival analysis with Cox regression.

    Conclusions:

    • Proper validation is essential to avoid poorly fitted or overfitted models.
    • Methods discussed are applicable to various regression models, particularly for binary, ordinal, and time-to-event outcomes.
    • The presented strategy enhances the reliability of regression models in clinical outcome prediction.