Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Demonstrating the implicit processing of visually presented words and pseudowords

C J Price1, R J Wise, R S Frackowiak

  • 1Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, Institute of Neurology, London, UK.

Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generalised random tessellation stratified sampling over auxiliary spaces.

Journal of applied statistics·2025
Same author

Four Functionally Distinct Regions in the Left Supramarginal Gyrus Support Word Processing.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2016
Same author

Neural changes in the primate brain correlated with the evolution of complex motor skills.

Scientific reports·2016
Same author

Multiwavelength interferometry system for the Orion laser facility.

Applied optics·2016
Same author

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia as a potential measure in substance use treatment--outcome studies.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2015
Same author

An in-vacuo optical levitation trap for high-intensity laser interaction experiments with isolated microtargets.

The Review of scientific instruments·2015
Same journal

Differentiation of cortical areas: effects of free energy minimization with broken symmetry.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Prior exposure to speech rapidly modulates cortical processing of high-level linguistic structure.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Beta bursts in SMA mediate anticipatory muscle inhibition.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Cognitive load modulates the effects of social contexts on facial expression processing.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

The neural mechanisms of aligning spatial perspectives.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Relationships between bilateral tapping skills and brain gray matter volumes: a voxel-based morphometry study.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
See all related articles

Even during visual tasks, words activate brain language networks. Unfamiliar pseudowords trigger stronger neural responses than familiar words, suggesting processing beyond task demands.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroimaging
  • Language Processing

Background:

  • The brain's language network is typically studied using tasks that explicitly require language comprehension.
  • It remains unclear if non-linguistic tasks are sufficient to engage these language networks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the mere presence of words in the visual field activates language-related brain areas, even during a non-linguistic task.
  • To compare the neural activation patterns elicited by words versus pseudowords in this context.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to measure brain activity.
  • Participants performed a nonlinguistic visual feature detection task while viewing words and pseudowords.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The presence of words and pseudowords activated widespread brain regions, including areas typically associated with language processing.
  • Pseudowords, lacking familiar phonological and semantic associations, generally produced greater activation than real words.
  • This suggests that word stimuli engage language networks implicitly, irrespective of task demands.

Conclusions:

  • Explicit task instructions may not be necessary to engage the brain's language network.
  • Implicit processing of word stimuli can lead to significant activation in language-related areas.
  • The degree of neural activation is influenced by the familiarity and associated cognitive load of the stimuli, with unfamiliar stimuli potentially driving stronger responses.