Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Morphological associations between the Angle classes

J M Dibbets1

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.

European Journal of Orthodontics
|April 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The growth of articular eminence height during craniofacial growth period.

Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice·2002
Same author

What makes orthodontic treatment good?

Clinical orthodontics and research·2001
Same author

[Early orthodontic treatment, a diagnostic challenge].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde·2001
Same author

The postnatal development of the temporal part of the human temporomandibular joint. A quantitative study on skulls.

Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft·1998
Same author

Multiple linear regression as an analytical tool in cephalometric studies.

British journal of orthodontics·1997
Same author

Association of lip posture and the dimensions of the tonsils and sagittal airway with facial morphology.

The Angle orthodontist·1997
Same journal

The use of teleorthodontics and artificial intelligence for orthodontic triage and screening in a publicly funded healthcare system: A crossover randomized controlled trial.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Very long-term (≥ 15 years) prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in adult Herbst patients.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Failure rates of 958 interradicular mini-screws for maxillary total arch distalization following a well-established insertion protocol.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Compensatory characteristics and influencing factors of the sagittal curvature of the maxillary arch based on three-dimensional fusion imaging.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Glass ionomer open exposure and closed exposure of palatally displaced canines: a randomised controlled trial comparing postoperative pain perception and complications.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Shape variability and sexual dimorphism of the chin: a 3D geometric morphometric analysis.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
See all related articles

Craniofacial form differences between Angle dental classes in children are primarily due to midface and cranial base variations, not the mandible. This suggests Angle classifications represent points on a continuum.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Craniofacial Biology
  • Dental Morphology

Background:

  • The Angle classification system categorizes malocclusion based on molar relationships.
  • Understanding the underlying craniofacial morphology is crucial for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between Angle classification (Class I, II, III) and craniofacial form in children before orthodontic treatment.
  • To identify which facial structures contribute most to the differences observed between Angle classes.

Main Methods:

  • Multiple linear regression analysis was used.
  • A sample of 170 children was analyzed prior to orthodontic intervention.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Systematic variations in midface and cranial base dimensions were found to account for differences between Angle classes.
  • Specifically, the cranial base angle (Ba-S-N) closed, and the S-N and S-Ba lengths shortened from Class II to Class III.
  • No systematic differences were observed in the juvenile mandible.

    • Conclusions:

    • The midface, supported by the cranial base, is the primary determinant of craniofacial differences among Angle classes in juveniles.
    • The Angle classification may represent arbitrary points along a continuous spectrum of craniofacial morphology.