Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sore throat management in general practice

P Little1, I Williamson

  • 1Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, UK.

Family Practice
|June 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Publisher Correction: Muscle abnormalities in Long COVID.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Reply: Muscle abnormalities in Long COVID.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Topical preparations for the treatment of mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

The British journal of dermatology·2021
Same author

Feasibility and acceptability of a brief routine weight management intervention for postnatal women embedded within the national child immunisation programme in primary care: randomised controlled cluster feasibility trial.

Trials·2020
Same author

Beliefs about inevitable decline among home-living older adults at risk of malnutrition: a qualitative study.

Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association·2020
Same author

Informal trade in livestock and livestock products.

Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)·2020
Same journal

The Amapola Test: description of a novel screening tool for visual alterations in primary care.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Deferred prescribing in practice: an observational study in community pharmacies in France during 2024-5 and feedback from pharmacists.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Assessing the risk of drug-induced corrected QT interval prolongation in primary care.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Universal-offer HIV testing amongst patients undergoing blood tests in primary care: results from a multi-centre study.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Sustainable healthcare knowledge, experience and curricular perspectives: a cross-sectional survey within the European Young Family Doctors Movement network.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

General practice care models and satisfaction in Australian residential aged care homes: a national survey of GPs, practice nurses, and managers.

Family practice·2026
See all related articles

Antibiotic use for sore throat in primary care lacks strong evidence and may cause more harm than good. Current guidelines overemphasize benefits and costs, questioning their validity for effective patient care.

Area of Science:

  • General Practice
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Health Policy

Background:

  • Recent national guidelines recommend throat swabs and antibiotics for sore throat management in primary care.
  • These guidelines suggest antibiotics shorten symptom duration and prevent complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the evidence supporting current primary care guidelines for sore throat management.
  • To assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of antibiotic prescribing and throat swab use.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic reviews and individual studies were analyzed.
  • The predictive value of clinical scorecards and symptom clusters was examined.
  • The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of throat swabs were assessed.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Evidence for antibiotic efficacy in general practice sore throat is marginal; benefits likely outweighed by costs.
  • Clinical scorecards have low predictive value.
  • Throat swabs are neither sensitive nor specific, increasing management costs.

Conclusions:

  • Current guidelines may not be firmly evidence-based for primary care settings.
  • Overemphasis on secondary care complications and lack of primary care evidence hinder guideline validity.
  • Skepticism towards guidelines and research implementation are likely consequences.