Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Does the communication between primary and secondary levels function?]

L Irazábal Olabarrieta1, B Gutiérrez Ruiz

  • 1Centro de Salud de Rekaldeberri Bilbao Llodio Alava.

Atencion Primaria
|April 15, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Information transfer between primary and secondary care is frequently lost, primarily due to specialists not replying. Improving communication channels and professional expectations is recommended to enhance healthcare quality.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Hospital emergency service utilization by the population from a primary health center: level of suitability].

Atencion primaria·1991
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare communication
  • Primary care
  • Secondary care

Background:

  • Effective communication between primary and secondary care is crucial for patient management.
  • The interclinical form (DI-1) is a key tool for information exchange.
  • Understanding information loss and response rates is vital for optimizing healthcare delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the quality of information transmitted via the DI-1 form.
  • To determine the frequency and causes of non-replies from specialists to primary care physicians.

Main Methods:

  • A descriptive, blind study was conducted in the Bizkaia Health region.
  • Data included DI-1 forms issued by 43 general practitioners and specialist replies over a 7-day period.
  • Information quality was evaluated by a panel of 5 healthcare professionals.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Information was lost in 78% of referrals.
  • The primary cause of information loss was specialists not replying (50.7%).
  • The quality of information on issued DIs was good/acceptable in 92.5%, and in 90% of replies.

Conclusions:

  • Significant information loss occurs mainly due to specialist non-response and, secondarily, to logistical issues.
  • Recommendations include implementing internal mail systems and studying professional attitudes to improve inter-professional relationships and healthcare quality.