Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Effective written communication in biomedical sciences

K S Rugh1, A W Hahn

  • 1WordsWorth Professional Communications, Rocheport, MO 65279, USA.

Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mpox Vaccine Hesitancy Among Sexually Active People with HIV in Care at Risk for mpox.

AIDS and behavior·2026
Same author

A multicenter randomized phase II trial of lenvatinib plus everolimus versus cabozantinib in patients with metastatic clear-cell RCC that progressed on PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition (LenCabo).

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2025
Same author

Differences in Methamphetamine Use, Self-Reported Impact, and HIV-Related Outcomes by Gender and Sexual Orientation in a Multisite U.S. Cohort of People with HIV in Care.

AIDS and behavior·2025
Same author

Cannabis use patterns among people with HIV before and after legalization.

Drug and alcohol dependence reports·2024
Same author

Alcohol and drug use severity are independently associated with antiretroviral adherence in the current treatment era.

AIDS care·2023
Same author

Blood- and tissue-based tumor genomics: a battle royale or match made in heaven?

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2017
Same journal

EFFECT OF FILTERING KINEMATICS ON FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATIONS OF HEAD IMPACTS IN HIGH SCHOOL FEMALE LACROSSE.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2026
Same journal

INHIBITING THE INHIBITOR: WOULD TARGETING PAI-1 RESULT IN A LOW-DOSE, WELL-TOLERATED TREATMENT OF EMPYEMA?

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2026
Same journal

QUANTIFYING HEAD IMPACT EXPOSURE, MECHANISMS AND KINEMATICS USING INSTRUMENTED MOUTHGUARDS IN MALE HIGH SCHOOL LACROSSE.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2026
Same journal

UTILITY OF CHEST ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN QUANTIFYING CLOT AND PLEURAL EFFUSION VOLUME IN PRECLINICAL MODELS OF PLEURAL DISEASE.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2026
Same journal

THE ROLE OF PERIPHERAL VISION IN ENHANCING BALANCE AND POSTURAL STABILITY: INSIGHTS FROM CENTRAL VISION OBSTRUCTION.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2025
Same journal

IMPACT OF NON-SKID SOCKS AND ANTERIOR WEIGHT ON POSTURAL RESPONSE AND STABILITY DURING PERTURBATION.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2025
See all related articles

Effective scientific writing is crucial for biomedical researchers. This paper emphasizes improving writing skills to clearly communicate research findings, addressing common errors in biomedical communication.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Science
  • Scientific Communication

Background:

  • The written word is a vital tool for biomedical scientists.
  • Writing skill development is often neglected in scientific training.
  • Research ability is frequently prioritized over communication proficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the significance of strong writing skills in biomedical science.
  • To identify and illustrate frequent errors in scientific writing.
  • To provide actionable recommendations for enhancing written scientific communication.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of the importance of effective scientific writing.
  • Analysis of common pitfalls in biomedical writing.
  • Presentation of strategies for improving written communication.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Biomedical scientists often lack essential writing proficiency.
  • Ineffective communication hinders the dissemination of research.
  • Specific examples of writing errors are provided.

Conclusions:

  • Good writing skills are fundamental for biomedical scientists.
  • Addressing common writing mistakes can improve research communication.
  • Implementing suggested strategies will enhance the clarity and impact of scientific writing.