Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Primate phylogeny: morphological vs. molecular results

J Shoshani1, C P Groves, E L Simons

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
|February 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

New material of Qatrania from Egypt with comments on the phylogenetic position of the parapithecidae (primates, Anthropoidea).

American journal of primatology·2020
Same author

Understanding proboscidean evolution: a formidable task.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same author

Climate change and the integrity of science.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2010
Same author

Systematics of early and middle Miocene Old World monkeys.

Journal of human evolution·2009
Same author

Dental microwear texture analysis of two families of subfossil lemurs from Madagascar.

Journal of human evolution·2009
Same author

The hands and feet of Archaeolemur: metrical affinities and their functional significance.

Journal of human evolution·2005
Same journal

Adaptive introgression facilitates tropical plant evolution: Pandanus as a case study.

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2026
Same journal

Molecular phylogenetics of Andean killifish genus Orestias (Cyprinodontiformes: Orestiidae) with emphasis on the O. agassii species complex, a widespread Andean clade.

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2026
Same journal

Resolving fuzzy species limits: nuclear evidence for speciation by hybridisation in Amazonian Trichomanes ferns.

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic assessment of microhylid frogs reveals widespread taxonomic confusion in the Asterophryinae and establishes the timing of diversification in Australia.

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomics, introgression, and demographic history of extant flamingos (Aves: Phoenicopteridae).

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2026
Same journal

The biogeographic and evolutionary history of Leiosauridae lizards reveal the influence of complex environmental and geological past dynamics in the Neotropical biomes.

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2026
See all related articles

Phylogenetic studies of primates reveal classifications are largely consistent. The position of Tarsius significantly impacts primate evolutionary trees, with molecular data supporting a close Homo-Pan clade relationship.

Area of Science:

  • Primate Phylogenetics
  • Comparative Morphology
  • Molecular Systematics

Background:

  • Primate classification has been debated, particularly the placement of Tarsius.
  • Both morphological and molecular data are crucial for understanding primate evolutionary history.
  • Fossil primates offer insights but present interpretation challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare phylogenetic reconstructions of Primates using morphological and molecular data.
  • To clarify the evolutionary relationships among living and fossil primates.
  • To evaluate the position of Tarsius within primate phylogeny.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of morphological characters from living primates.
  • Integration of molecular character data from existing literature.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of fossil primate evidence to inform phylogenetic hypotheses.

    • Main Results:

    • Phylogenetic reconstructions are broadly similar between morphological and molecular studies.
    • The placement of Tarsius is a key factor influencing different primate classifications.
    • Molecular data and Tarsius morphology support distinct hypotheses regarding primate clades (e.g., Prosimii, Anthropoidea, Strepsirhini, Haplorhini).
    • Close relationships within hominids (Homo, Pan, Gorilla, Pongo) are confirmed, with strong molecular support for a Homo-Pan clade.

    Conclusions:

    • Primate classification is generally robust, but Tarsius's position requires careful consideration.
    • Molecular data provide strong support for specific clades, including the Homo-Pan relationship.
    • Further research integrating diverse data sources is needed to fully resolve primate evolutionary history.