The impact of thrombolytic therapy on arterial and graft occlusions: a critical analysis

The indications for intraarterial thrombolytic therapy of lower extremity native arterial and synthetic graft occlusions prior to vascular reconstructions requires further refinement before firm conclusions can be made.

A retrospective review of 55 patients undergoing 81 lytic treatments with high dose urokinase from February 1989 to February 1993 was performed. The cases were divided into three groups: Group I: successful thrombolysis with residual defects followed by surgical reconstruction or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA); Group II: successful thrombolysis alone; and Group III: failure of thrombolysis requiring reconstruction or leading to amputation. No effort was made to analyze the particular type of reconstruction. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 1627 days (4 years and 5 1/2 months).

One, two, and three year patency rates were 47%, 24%, and 8% for Group I; 57%, 46%, and 46% for Group II; and 24%, 10%, and 10% for Group III respectively. The one, two and three year limb salvage rates were 92%, 76%, and 76% for Group I; 82%, 82%, and 82% for Group II; and 48%, 37%, and 37% for Group III respectively. Forty-one complications occurred in 35 of the 81 (43%) lytic treatments.

Intraarterial thrombolytic therapy can be regarded as a possible consideration in the initial management of acute lower extremity arterial and synthetic graft occlusions especially in patients with multiple prior vascular reconstructions. Unsuccessful thrombolysis results in a poor outcome despite surgical reconstruction in the majority of cases.