Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Decision and detection limits for linear homoscedastic assays

A Dunne1

  • 1Department of Statistics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland.

Statistics in Medicine
|September 30, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mechano-immunomodulation of macrophages influences the regenerative environment of fracture healing through the regulation of angiogenesis and osteogenesis.

Acta biomaterialia·2025
Same author

Obstetrical Events Support Team (OEST): Preventing harm, reducing costs from neonatal brain injury.

Irish medical journal·2025
Same author

Human macrophage polarisation and regulation of angiogenesis and osteogenesis is dependent on culture extracellular matrix and dimensionality.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2024
Same author

Changes in Multidisciplinary Tracheostomy Team Practice Over Time.

Irish medical journal·2022
Same author

The Development of a National Paediatric Psycho-Oncology Service.

Irish medical journal·2021
Same author

Osteoarthritis-associated basic calcium phosphate crystals alter immune cell metabolism and promote M1 macrophage polarization.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2019

Estimating calibration parameters significantly impacts assay decision and detection limits. Accounting for parameter variation is crucial for accurate limit calculations in analytical assays.

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Assay decision and detection limits are critical metrics in analytical chemistry.
  • Accurate determination of these limits is essential for reliable quantitative measurements.
  • Previous methods often assumed calibration parameters were known, potentially introducing bias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of estimating calibration parameters on assay decision and detection limits.
  • To derive expressions for these limits under conditions of known and unknown calibration parameters.
  • To compare different computational methods for decision and detection limits.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of analytical expressions for decision and detection limits for linear homoscedastic assays.
  • Application of derived expressions to a cyclic AMP assay example.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simulation study to compare various methods for computing these limits.

    • Main Results:

    • Expressions for decision and detection limits were derived for both known and unknown calibration parameters.
    • A simulation study highlighted differences in limit calculations based on parameter estimation.
    • The study confirmed that variation in calibration parameter estimators influences limit accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • Ignoring the variation in calibration parameter estimators can lead to inaccurate decision and detection limits.
    • Accurate determination of assay limits requires incorporating the uncertainty associated with calibration parameter estimation.
    • The findings underscore the importance of robust statistical approaches in analytical method validation.