Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Notes on conditional confidence limits under inverse sampling

K J Lui1

  • 1Department of Mathematical Sciences, College of Sciences, San Diego State University, CA 92182, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|September 30, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interval estimation of the attributable risk in case-control studies with matched pairs.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2001
Same author

Sample size determination for equivalence test using rate ratio of sensitivity and specificity in paired sample data.

Controlled clinical trials·2001
Same author

Notes on interval estimation of the attributable risk in cross-sectional sampling.

Statistics in medicine·2001
Same author

Tests for homogeneity of the risk ratio in a series of 2x2 tables.

Statistics in medicine·2000
Same author

Confidence intervals for the risk ratio under cluster sampling based on the beta-binomial model.

Statistics in medicine·2000
Same author

A revisit on tests for homogeneity of the risk difference.

Biometrics·2000
Same journal

Predictor-Assisted Nonparametric Graphical Models With Multivariate Error-Prone Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Treatment Decision Estimation for Right-Censored Survival Data Through Parameter Transfer Learning.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces inverse sampling for deriving exact confidence intervals for relative risk and difference in cohort studies. It also presents methods for approximate confidence limits on attributable risk in case-control studies with rare diseases.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Traditional methods for confidence intervals in two-by-two tables may be inadequate for small sample sizes.
  • Exact conditional distributions are often used, but can be complex to derive.
  • Inverse sampling offers an alternative approach for specific sampling designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a straightforward method for deriving confidence intervals for relative risk and relative difference using inverse sampling in cohort studies.
  • To develop approximate conditional confidence limits for attributable risk in case-control studies with rare diseases using inverse sampling.
  • To provide exact hypothesis testing procedures for small sample sizes where large-sample approximations are insufficient.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing inverse sampling to fix the number of subjects in a specific category.
  • Deriving exact conditional confidence intervals for relative risk and relative difference.
  • Applying inverse sampling for approximate conditional confidence limits on attributable risk.
  • Developing exact conditional hypothesis testing procedures for two-by-two tables.

    • Main Results:

    • Inverse sampling simplifies the derivation of confidence intervals for relative risk and difference in cohort studies.
    • Approximate conditional confidence limits for attributable risk are achievable in rare disease case-control studies via inverse sampling.
    • Exact hypothesis testing is feasible for small sample sizes, offering improved accuracy over large-sample methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Inverse sampling provides an efficient and accurate method for constructing confidence intervals and performing hypothesis tests in specific epidemiological study designs.
    • The proposed methods are particularly valuable for small to moderate sample sizes and rare disease scenarios.
    • This approach enhances statistical rigor in analyzing categorical data in epidemiological research.