Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2026

07:21
Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication
Published on: February 10, 2011
The "in-between' times: video analysis of peer interactions
Summary
Structured activities are prioritized in day services for adults with severe learning disabilities. However, unstructured
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Disability Studies
- Education
Background:
- Day services for adults with severe learning disabilities often emphasize structured, timetabled activities.
- Current policies focus on formal learning and staff interaction during scheduled times.
- Significant periods of waiting time ('in-between' times) occur between scheduled activities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the potential of 'in-between' times in day services for adults with severe learning disabilities.
- To explore how informal interactions during waiting periods can promote learning and communication.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative research approach focusing on observational data within day service settings.
- Analysis of unstructured periods and spontaneous interactions between service users and staff.
- Exploration of the dynamics during 'in-between' times.
Main Results:
- Identified 'in-between' times as significant portions of the service user's day.
- Observed potential for informal learning and communication during these unstructured periods.
- Highlighted the overlooked value of waiting times for social interaction and skill development.
Conclusions:
- The 'in-between' times in day services offer valuable opportunities for informal learning and communication.
- Rethinking service structures to incorporate and leverage these informal periods can enhance user engagement.
- Further research is needed to develop strategies for maximizing the potential of unstructured time.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about the way you...
Social Exchange Theory
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication
Since the early 2000s, computer-mediated communication (CMC) has grown rapidly, playing a crucial role in self-development. A key distinction between CMC and real-life interactions is the lack of a physically present partner. This absence makes non-verbal cues such as facial expressions, body language, and paralinguistic signals unavailable in CMC platforms like email, instant messaging, or social media. The lack of these cues can create ambiguity and complicate how feedback is interpreted.The...
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Self-monitoring is a central construct in understanding individual differences in self-presentation strategies across social contexts. It refers to how individuals observe, regulate, and control their expressive behavior and self-presentation following situational cues. Self-monitoring reflects a person's sensitivity to social appropriateness and willingness to adapt behavior to fit varying interpersonal demands.High vs. Low Self-Monitoring IndividualsIndividuals high in self-monitoring are...

