Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Euthanasia: going Dutch?

R G Twycross1

  • 1Pallative Medicine, Oxford University, England.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
|February 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Hospice doctors should prioritize relieving patient suffering over euthanasia. While opposing euthanasia, doctors must balance preserving life with alleviating pain, using methods like the principle of double effect.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The alimentary absorption of diamorphine and morphine in man as indicated by urinary excretion studies.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2012
Same author

Morphine and alternative opioids in cancer pain: the EAPC recommendations.

British journal of cancer·2001
Same author

A 5-year review of a lymphoedema service.

European journal of cancer care·1996
Same author

Management of pain in skeletal metastases.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·1995
Same author

The fight against cancer pain.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·1994
Same author

Monitoring drug use in palliative care.

Palliative medicine·1994
Same journal

The Placebo Effect and Long History of the Habit of Belief. How a Medieval Image Reveals the Power of the Invisible.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2026
Same journal

For more events and to book online, please visit //www.rsm.ac.uk/events.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2026
Same journal

Who is responsible when AI kills?

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2026
Same journal

Patient-centred care: is it enough?

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2026
Same journal

Continuity of care beyond access: measuring resolution rather than contact.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2026
Same journal

Ethnic differences in specialty destinations in UK medicine: a repeated cross-sectional analysis of secondary data.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Palliative Care

Background:

  • A hospice doctor with 25 years of experience reflects on the ethical considerations of end-of-life care.
  • The debate surrounding euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is a complex issue in modern medicine.

Observation:

  • The author's extensive experience reinforces opposition to euthanasia, citing observations from the Netherlands.
  • Acknowledges that physicians may be tempted to hasten death due to patient suffering, indicating empathy and clinical experience.

Findings:

  • Euthanasia is not considered the answer when physical, psychological, social, and spiritual aspects are comprehensively addressed.
  • Distinguishes between intentionally causing death (euthanasia) and treatments that may incidentally shorten life (principle of double effect).
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos

Implications:

  • Doctors have a dual obligation to preserve life and relieve suffering, with the latter becoming paramount in terminal illness.
  • Relieving intolerable suffering is a moral imperative, even if palliative treatments carry a minimal risk of hastening death.