Comparative study between sonography, pathology and UGP in women with perimenopausal bleeding
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Non-Invasive Ultrasound Assessment of Endometrial Cancer Progression in Pax8-Directed Deletion of the Tumor Suppressors Arid1a and Pten in Mice
Published on: February 17, 2023
O el-Ahmady1, M Gad, R el-Sheimy
1Tumor Marker Oncology Research Center, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract:
Adenocarcinoma is the commonest primary malignancy encountered in the endometrium. Adenomatous hyperplasia represents an important precancerous endometrial lesion. In this study, different techniques have been applied in a trial to early detect endometrial carcinoma and to distinguish between hyperplasia with minimal and high risk of progression to endometrial adenocarcinoma. Eighty women were included in this study and classified into 4 groups: 10 with adenocarcinoma, 28 with simple hyperplasia, 12 with hyperplasia with atypia and 30 normal healthy women. All individuals were subjected to Doppler endovaginal ultrasonography (EVS) for endometrial thickness and uterine artery resistance index (RI). Endometrial biopsy was taken for histopathological examination and DNA analysis. 24-hr urine was collected for the estimation of UGP by ELISA using reagents supplied by Ciba Corning Diagnostica, Alameda, CA, USA (Triton UGP-EIA). On referring to histopathological findings, no single parameter was seen to be specific and sensitive enough to differentiate between benign and malignant endometrial lesions. Doppler endovaginal ultrasonography could detect 76% of endometrial abnormalities. DNA ploidy and UGP showed equal sensitivity rate (60%) in endometrial carcinoma but DNA ploidy was more specific than UGP (0% and 10% false positivity in benign endometrial diseases respectively.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called a...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography

