Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stratification for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

W T van den Broek1, A B Bijnen, P de Ruiter

  • 1Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Wilhelminalaan 12, 1815 JD Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

Surgical Endoscopy
|August 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reasons for not reaching or using web-based self-management applications, and the use and evaluation of Oncokompas among cancer survivors, in the context of a randomised controlled trial.

Internet interventions·2021
Same author

The eHealth self-management application 'Oncokompas' that supports cancer survivors to improve health-related quality of life and reduce symptoms: which groups benefit most?

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)·2020
Same author

Cost-utility of an eHealth application 'Oncokompas' that supports cancer survivors in self-management: results of a randomised controlled trial.

Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice·2020
Same author

Effectiveness of routine follow-up in the detection of contralateral breast cancer in young women with early breast cancer.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2013
Same author

No difference between lowest and highest volume hospitals in outcome after colorectal cancer surgery in the southern Netherlands.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2013
Same author

Can the outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence be predicted?

International journal of colorectal disease·2008
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of transoral incisionless fundoplication in non-obese and obese adults: a population-based cohort study from the United States.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Enhanced view/extended totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa repair versus open Rives-Stoppa repair: a single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Robotic-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a scoping review of preclinical and early clinical evidence.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Conversion of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty to bariatric surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence and chatbots in general surgery: a survey among surgeons in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

The quality of patient care after introducing laparoscopic cholecystectomy remained stable. Further improvements in laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes may be achieved by stratifying patients and assigning high-risk cases to specialized surgeons.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical innovation and patient outcomes
  • Comparative effectiveness research in surgery

Background:

  • Initial retrospective study indicated improved patient care post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
  • This study aimed to assess the sustained or improved quality of patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To verify if the observed improvements in patient care after laparoscopic cholecystectomy introduction were maintained.
  • To compare outcomes between the introduction year (1992) and the standard procedure year (1993).
  • To evaluate differences in outcomes between specialized and general surgeons.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of elective cholecystectomies for symptomatic cholelithiasis.
  • Comparison of surgical outcomes between 1992 and 1993.
  • Analysis of procedures performed by specialized versus general surgeons.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Increased cholecystectomies in 1993 compared to 1992, with a rise in laparoscopic procedures but also conversion rates.
  • Higher conversion rates for general surgeons in 1993 compared to specialized surgeons.
  • Comparable morbidity and mortality rates between years and surgeon types.

Conclusions:

  • Patient care quality did not significantly change between 1992 and 1993.
  • Stratifying patients for surgery by specialized or general surgeons could optimize outcomes.
  • High-risk patients may benefit more from specialized surgeons, while routine cases can be handled by general surgeons.