Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The aesthetic nose: do we agree?

M Mendelsohn1, M Farrell

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

The Journal of Otolaryngology
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Tinkering with care: Implementing extended-release buprenorphine depot treatment for opioid dependence.

The International journal on drug policy·2024
Same author

Rare Variant of Lateral Medullary Syndrome; Opalski Syndrome with Cerebellar Infarction.

Irish medical journal·2023
Same author

Extreme eutrophication and salinisation in the Coorong estuarine-lagoon ecosystem of Australia's largest river basin (Murray-Darling).

Marine pollution bulletin·2023
Same author

Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Warming and redistribution of nitrogen inputs drive an increase in terrestrial nitrous oxide emission factor.

Nature communications·2022
Same journal

Primary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the submandibular gland: unique presentation and surprising treatment response.

The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
Same journal

Hearing recovery after meningitis.

The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
Same journal

Endoscopic transnasal sphenopalatine arterial ligation for intractable posterior epistaxis in a young child.

The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
Same journal

[Non-functional parathyroid cyst].

The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
Same journal

Cacosmia secondary to an olfactory groove meningioma.

The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
Same journal

Hemangioma of the vocal cords: review of two cases.

The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
See all related articles

People have varying ideas about attractive noses, even when specific features are altered. This study highlights the importance of personalized patient requests over a standard aesthetic ideal in rhinoplasty surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Aesthetic Science
  • Facial Aesthetics

Background:

  • Preoperative consultations in rhinoplasty aim to align surgeon and patient aesthetic goals.
  • Defining a universally attractive nose remains a complex challenge in aesthetic surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate consensus on nasal attractiveness among a diverse group of judges.
  • To determine preferences for specific nasal parameters (tip projection, tip rotation, dorsal hump size) in rhinoplasty.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized computerized video-imaging to generate nine distinct case studies of rhinoplasty modifications.
  • Isolated alterations to single parameters: tip projection, tip rotation, or dorsal hump size.
  • Surveyed 250 judges to identify the most aesthetically pleasing image within each case study.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Significant trends in preference were observed for specific nasal features.
  • Midrange values were preferred in most cases, with notable exceptions.
  • Overcorrection was preferred over undercorrection for tip projection, tip rotation, and dorsal hump size.

Conclusions:

  • Individual preferences for nasal aesthetics vary significantly, challenging the concept of a 'standard' attractive nose.
  • The observed discrepancies underscore the critical need for surgeons to prioritize and understand individual patient requests in rhinoplasty.