Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Isolation and Characterization of Neutrophils with Anti-Tumor Properties
Published on: June 19, 2015
Neutrophil activation, tumor necrosis factor, and survival after endotoxic and hemorrhagic shock
J Barroso-Aranda1, B W Zweifach, J C Mathison
1Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0412, USA.
Abstract:
Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) may contribute to organ injury in both hemorrhagic and endotoxic shock. Both models of shock exhibit a "flight of the leukocytes," but the mechanisms for entrapment of leukocytes in the microcirculation differ. The objective of this study was to investigate lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced shock and hemorrhagic shock with similar survival rates, in terms of circulating PMNs, activated circulating PMNs, plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF) activity, and PMN adhesion. In the LPS protocol, rats received 6.5 mg/kg E. coli LPS i.v., which resulted in 50% survival. In the hemorrhagic shock protocol, rats were maintained for 3 h at 40 mm Hg mean arterial pressure, and survival during a 24-h observation period was 40%. LPS injection and hemorrhage caused rapid neutropenia in survivors and nonsurvivors. Low circulating PMN counts persisted during hypotension in the hemorrhagic protocol and among nonsurvivors in the LPS protocol, but in both protocols a tendency toward significantly higher circulating PMN counts in survivors compared with nonsurvivors was found. In both protocols, survivors had significantly lower fractions of circulating activated PMNs and lower adhesion of circulating PMNs to nylon fibers. In the LPS protocol, higher plasma TNF activity was found in nonsurvivors than in survivors, but no TNF activity in plasma could be found throughout the hemorrhagic protocol. These results indicate that nonsurvivors in both shock models exhibit higher levels of PMN activation. No correlation was detected between PMN activation and plasma TNF activity to suggest that TNF serves as the primary mediator of circulating PMN activation.
Insights
In both hemorrhagic and endotoxic shock, higher polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) activation is seen in non-survivors. This PMN activation, not plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF), appears key in shock-induced organ injury.
Area of Science:
- Physiology
- Immunology
- Pathology
Background:
- Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) are implicated in organ injury during hemorrhagic and endotoxic shock.
- Distinct mechanisms of leukocyte entrapment occur in these shock models.
- Understanding PMN behavior is crucial for shock pathophysiology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare circulating PMNs, activated PMNs, plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF) activity, and PMN adhesion in LPS-induced and hemorrhagic shock models.
- To investigate the role of PMN activation and TNF in shock outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Rats were subjected to either LPS injection (6.5 mg/kg) or controlled hemorrhage (3h at 40 mm Hg mean arterial pressure).
- Survival rates were monitored (50% for LPS, 40% for hemorrhage).
- Circulating PMN counts, PMN activation, plasma TNF activity, and PMN adhesion were measured.
Main Results:
- Both shock models induced rapid neutropenia.
- Survivors in both groups showed higher circulating PMN counts compared to non-survivors.
- Survivors exhibited significantly lower circulating activated PMNs and reduced PMN adhesion.
- Non-survivors in LPS shock had higher plasma TNF activity; no TNF was detected in hemorrhagic shock.
Conclusions:
- Higher levels of PMN activation are characteristic of non-survivors in both LPS-induced and hemorrhagic shock.
- PMN activation, rather than plasma TNF activity, appears to be a critical factor in shock-related outcomes.
- TNF may not be the primary mediator of circulating PMN activation in these shock models.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammation
NF-κB-dependent Signaling Pathway
NF-κB-dependent Signaling Mechanism
The heterodimer of NF-κB...
The Extrinsic Apoptotic Pathway
Bacterial Toxins
Cellular Injury IV: Necrosis
Acute Inflammation III: Local and Systemic Effects

