Peripheral blood progenitor cells for marrow reconstitution: mobilization and collection strategies

Previous studies of PBPC BMR have found evidence supporting its safety, feasibility, and efficacy when used in a wide range of patients. Although the optimal regimen for mobilization remains a focus of debate, data from the use of combinations of chemotherapy and cytokines suggest that there is more rapid white cell and platelet engraftment than with BMT, which leads to decreased transfusion requirements and, possibly, reduced patient care costs. Recent advances in the field include allogeneic PBPC BMR, negative selection of tumor cells to reduce contamination, and positive selection of CD34+ cells. These new strategies are anticipated to enhance the therapeutic effectiveness of PBPC BMR while minimizing toxicity. Still, the ultimate comparison of PBSC BMR and medullary BMT will depend on the results of well-designed, randomized, controlled clinical trials with long-term outcome analysis. However, the refinement and improvement of mobilization and collection techniques for PBPC BMR continue to add to the armamentarium of current therapeutic approaches for cancer and related nonmalignant conditions and will enable future strategies for ex vivo expansion of progenitor cells and use in gene transfer studies.