Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Treatment needs following activator-headgear therapy

O Bondevik1

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, University of Oslo, Norway.

The Angle Orthodontist
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Activator-headgear treatment effectively corrected Class II malocclusions but often left overbite, overjet, and spacing issues. Patient age was the key factor for successful orthodontic treatment outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A longitudinal study of dental arches and occlusal changes in adults from 22 to 33, and 33 to 43 years of age.

Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie·2015
Same author

Changes in occlusion between 23 and 34 years.

The Angle orthodontist·1998
Same author

Viggo Andresen--a pioneer in orofacial orthopedics.

Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie·1997
Same author

Growth changes in the cranial base and the face: a longitudinal cephalometric study of linear and angular changes in adult Norwegians.

European journal of orthodontics·1995
Same author

How effective is the combined activator-headgear treatment?

European journal of orthodontics·1991
Same author

[Does orthodontic treatment affect craniofacial growth?].

Den Norske tannlaegeforenings tidende·1990

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Dentofacial Orthopedics

Background:

  • Orthodontic treatment aims to correct malocclusions for improved function and aesthetics.
  • Combined activator-headgear therapy is a common approach for specific dentofacial anomalies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the residual malocclusions after combined activator-headgear treatment.
  • To identify factors influencing treatment success in orthodontics.

Main Methods:

  • Screening of study models from patients treated between 1972-1982.
  • Exclusion of patients requiring a second treatment phase or showing poor cooperation.

Main Results:

  • Overbite, overjet, and interdental spaces were the most common remaining orthodontic issues.
  • Class II skeletal and dental relationships were successfully corrected in most cases.
  • Younger patient age at the start of treatment predicted better outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Combined activator-headgear therapy is effective for Class II correction but may not fully resolve all malocclusions.
  • Age is a significant prognostic factor in orthodontic treatment success.

Related Experiment Videos