Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Developing an outcomes measurement system: the value of testing
1Department of Research and Evaluation, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181, USA.
Abstract:
Outcomes measurement systems often experience similar challenges to implementing data collection and demonstrating value. This article examines the experiences of 451 hospitals participating in a 2-year research effort designed to assess the ability of participants to successfully implement collection of obstetric and peri-operative indicator data for development of an outcomes measurement system. Measures of ability to implement include rate of attrition and reasons for withdrawal, resources expended, months of data transmitted, internal factors that affected ability to operationalize data collection, and assessment of value of participating in the testing process. The findings indicate considerable variation in implementation ability, challenges encountered, and satisfaction with the experience. Several changes in the operational system were made in response to the findings. Many of the lessons learned from the testing experience may be applicable to sponsors of and participants in other outcomes measurement systems.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
Significance Testing: Overview
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...

