Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression

N R Crick1, K A Dodge

  • 1Human Development and Family Studies, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.

Child Development
|June 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Consensus statement on developmentally appropriate policy and practice for adolescents in foster care.

Children and youth services review·2026
Same author

Impulsivity and genetic variants in DRD2 and ANKK1 moderate longitudinal associations between sleep problems and overweight from ages 5 to 11.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2013
Same author

The timing of child physical maltreatment: a cross-domain growth analysis of impact on adolescent externalizing and internalizing problems.

Development and psychopathology·2002
Same author

Peer rejection in childhood, involvement with antisocial peers in early adolescence, and the development of externalizing behavior problems.

Development and psychopathology·2001
Same author

Antecedents and behavior-problem outcomes of parental monitoring and psychological control in early adolescence.

Child development·2001
Same author

The dyadic nature of social information processing in boys' reactive and proactive aggression.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2001
Same journal

Reciprocal relations between parent-adolescent closeness and adolescent depressive symptoms across the pre-to-post COVID-19 pandemic.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Young children use conversational timing as a cue for prosocial commitment.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Timing and type of domestic violence exposure and adolescents' experiences of peer violence.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Comprehension of "can" predicts performance on a nonverbal measure of modal concepts at 48 but not 36 months.

Child development·2026
Same journal

An associative learning account of how saliva becomes a cue for comfort.

Child development·2026
Same journal

If moms do it, it can't be that important: Children's reasoning about gender disparities in domestic work.

Child development·2026
See all related articles

This study differentiates reactive and proactive aggression in children. Findings support distinct social information-processing patterns for each aggression type, aiding in understanding aggressive behavior.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Child Psychology
  • Aggression Research

Background:

  • Theories suggest distinct forms of reactive (hostile) and proactive (instrumental) aggression.
  • Ethological observations in animals and children support this distinction.
  • Validating these distinct aggression types is crucial for targeted interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the distinction between reactive and proactive aggression in children.
  • To examine social information-processing patterns associated with each aggression type.
  • To test specific hypotheses regarding attributional biases and goal selection in aggressive children.

Main Methods:

  • Identified groups of reactive aggressive, proactive aggressive, and nonaggressive children (n=624, ages 9-12).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed social information-processing patterns using hypothetical vignettes.
  • Tested hypotheses on attributional biases, evaluation of aggression, and goal selection.

    • Main Results:

    • Reactive-aggressive children showed hostile attributional biases in provocation scenarios.
    • Proactive-aggressive children held more positive views of aggression and its outcomes.
    • Proactive-aggressive children prioritized instrumental over relational social goals.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings provide partial support for distinct social information-processing patterns in reactive and proactive aggression.
    • This research contributes to differentiating aggression subtypes in developmental psychology.
    • Understanding these distinctions can inform more effective prevention and intervention strategies for aggressive behavior in children.