Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using the evidence. A need for quantity, not quality?

C J Hyde1

  • 1U.K. Cochrane Centre.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnostic accuracy of high-definition CT coronary angiography in high-risk patients.

Clinical radiology·2015
Same author

Screening to prevent spontaneous preterm birth: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2009
Same author

Improving the evidence base for transfusion medicine: the work of the UK systematic review initiative.

Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)·2009
Same author

Evidence for indications of fresh frozen plasma.

Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine·2008
Same author

Methods of prediction and prevention of pre-eclampsia: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2008
Same author

Can you see the wood for the trees? Making sense of forest plots in systematic reviews 2. Analysis of the combined results from the included studies.

Transfusion·2008
Same journal

Measuring, Valuing, and Incorporating Patient and Caregiver Productivity Costs in Economic Evaluations: A Scoping Review and Environmental Scan.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

ASSESSING COST EFFECTIVENESS IN ONCOLOGY TREATMENT SEQUENCES: A REVIEW OF PATHWAY MODELLING METHODS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

Practice and challenges of HB-HTA in China: insights from hospital management and clinical perspectives.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

Policy Dialogue on Health Technology Assessment in Middle East and North Africa: Reporting from an HTAi initiative.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

What is new in the early health technology assessment's new definition?

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

Incorporating climate impact in health care decisions: new criteria to be tested in the Netherlands.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
See all related articles

Research evidence use requires more than just high quality. Accessibility and understanding initiatives are crucial for greater impact, not just evidence quality improvements.

Area of Science:

  • Health Research
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • The effective utilization of research evidence is critical for informed decision-making in various fields.
  • Current approaches often focus on improving the quality of research evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight that factors beyond research quality significantly influence evidence use.
  • To emphasize the importance of evidence accessibility and understanding initiatives.

Main Methods:

  • This study is a conceptual analysis based on existing literature regarding research evidence utilization.
  • It synthesizes theoretical perspectives on knowledge translation and implementation science.

Main Results:

  • Evidence use is a multifactorial process influenced by quality, quantity, and accessibility.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Initiatives promoting broader understanding and accessibility are as vital as evidence quality.

    • Conclusions:

    • Improving research evidence quality alone is insufficient to guarantee increased use.
    • A holistic approach considering accessibility and understanding is necessary for maximizing research impact.