Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Informed consent: a dialogue

C W Quimby

    Radiology
    |June 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Radiologists must inform patients about potential allergic reactions before administering urographic contrast media. This ensures informed consent and addresses legal precedents regarding patient safety.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Loss prevention.

    Tennessee medicine : journal of the Tennessee Medical Association·1996
    Same author

    Antitrust aspects of exclusive contracts in medical imaging.

    Radiology·1985
    Same author

    Anesthetic considerations for the patient with homocystinuria.

    Anesthesia and analgesia·1982
    Same author

    The outline of a medical malpractice trial for radiologists.

    Radiology·1979
    Same author

    Malpractice viewed in perspective.

    Southern medical journal·1977
    Same author

    Anesthesia and the infarcted heart.

    Anesthesia and analgesia·1974

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Law
    • Radiology
    • Patient Safety

    Background:

    • Informed consent is crucial in medical procedures.
    • Urographic contrast media injections carry risks, including idiosyncratic reactions.
    • Legal scrutiny of informed consent in radiology is increasing.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine legal precedents and judicial approaches to informed consent for urographic contrast media.
    • To clarify the responsibilities of radiologists in disclosing potential risks.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of legal case law and scholarly articles on informed consent in radiology.
    • Analysis of current court decisions regarding contrast media injections.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Courts emphasize the necessity of disclosing potential adverse events.
  • Radiologists have a legal and ethical obligation to inform patients about idiosyncratic reactions.
  • Failure to disclose can lead to legal challenges.

    • Conclusions:

    • Informed consent for urographic contrast media must include discussion of idiosyncratic reactions.
    • Radiologists must proactively educate patients on all potential risks.
    • Adherence to informed consent principles protects both patients and practitioners.