Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pressure sore prevention: using and evaluating risk assessment tools

J J Deeks

    British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)
    |March 14, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    S-GRAS score for prognostic classification of adrenocortical carcinoma: an international, multicenter ENSAT study.

    European journal of endocrinology·2021
    Same author

    Sensitivity and specificity of SkinVision are likely to have been overestimated.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2020
    Same author

    Biological variation of cardiac troponins in chronic kidney disease.

    Annals of clinical biochemistry·2020
    Same author

    Erratum to: Methods for evaluating medical tests and biomarkers.

    Diagnostic and prognostic research·2019
    Same author

    Meta-analysis of test accuracy studies using imputation for partial reporting of multiple thresholds.

    Research synthesis methods·2017
    Same author

    Predicting the chance of live birth for women undergoing IVF: a novel pretreatment counselling tool.

    Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2015

    This review examines clinical practice guidelines for preventing and treating pressure sores, focusing on risk assessment tools and their interpretation. It suggests developing protocols to ensure effective use of assessment data for interventions.

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical Practice Guidelines
    • Evidence-Based Medicine
    • Healthcare Management

    Background:

    • The Department of Health published guidelines in 1995 for pressure sore prevention and treatment.
    • These guidelines were developed through research evidence review, expert consensus, and consultation.
    • This article specifically reviews the risk assessment section of these guidelines.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically review the evidence evaluating pressure sore risk assessment tools.
    • To identify challenges in interpreting research evidence on risk assessment.
    • To discuss the development of risk assessment protocols for effective intervention allocation.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of research evidence on pressure sore risk assessment tools.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the interpretation of evidence from expert panels and consultations.
  • Discussion of protocol development for risk assessment data utilization.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified problems in interpreting research evidence evaluating risk assessment tools.
    • Determined conclusions that can be reasonably drawn from the available evidence.
    • Highlighted the need for effective allocation of preventive interventions based on risk assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Risk assessment is crucial for pressure sore prevention.
    • Interpreting evidence on risk assessment tools presents challenges.
    • Developing protocols can optimize the use of risk assessment data for targeted interventions.