Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

SUPPORT study results--implications for hospice care

M E Greipp

    The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care
    |May 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A follow-up study of 14 young adults with complex regional pain syndrome type I.

    The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses·2000
    Same author

    Viatical settlements: ethical perspectives.

    The American journal of hospice & palliative care·1999
    Same author

    Ethical decision making and mandatory reporting in cases of suspected child abuse.

    Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners·1998
    Same author

    Decisions to utilize hospice--pilot study results.

    The American journal of hospice & palliative care·1996
    Same author

    The hospice choice: ethical decision making.

    The American journal of hospice & palliative care·1996
    Same author

    Client age, gender, behaviour: effects on quality of predicted self-reactions and colleague reactions.

    Nursing ethics·1996
    Same journal

    Relationships Between Advance Care Planning Engagement, Patients' Religious Practices, and Spirituality.

    The American journal of hospice & palliative care·2026
    Same journal

    The Efficacy of Spiritual Care Intervention on Readmissions of Hospitalized Patients Receiving Palliative Care: A Quasi-Experimental Pilot Study Proposal.

    The American journal of hospice & palliative care·2026
    Same journal

    Nurse-Led Advance Care Planning Interventions for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review.

    The American journal of hospice & palliative care·2026
    Same journal

    Self-Reported Cannabis Use and Symptom Burden Among Patients With Cancer Receiving Palliative Care.

    The American journal of hospice & palliative care·2026
    Same journal

    Efficacy of Oxygen Therapy for the Relief of Dyspnea in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.

    The American journal of hospice & palliative care·2026
    Same journal

    Survival Heterogeneity in U.S. Hospice Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

    The American journal of hospice & palliative care·2026
    See all related articles

    Comprehensive interventions failed to improve end-of-life decision-making for seriously ill patients. Despite a four-year study, outcomes for the intervention group were no better than the control group, impacting hospice and palliative care.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Research
    • Clinical Trials
    • Healthcare Interventions

    Background:

    • Seriously ill hospitalized patients often face complex end-of-life decisions.
    • Prolonged, mechanically supported dying can cause distress for patients and families.
    • Improving end-of-life care is a critical goal in modern medicine.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To enhance end-of-life decision-making for hospitalized patients.
    • To reduce the occurrence of prolonged, painful dying processes.
    • To evaluate the effectiveness of comprehensive interventions in palliative care.

    Main Methods:

    • A large-scale study involving 9,105 seriously ill hospitalized patients and their physicians.
    • A four-year research period to assess intervention impact.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison between an intervention group and a control group.

    • Main Results:

    • Well-planned, comprehensive interventions did not yield better outcomes for the intervention group.
    • No significant improvement was observed in end-of-life decision-making or dying patterns.
    • The study found no difference in outcomes between the intervention and control groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Current comprehensive interventions may be insufficient to improve end-of-life care outcomes.
    • Findings challenge existing approaches in hospice and palliative care.
    • Further research is needed to develop more effective strategies for end-of-life care.