Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Nurse caring behaviors: comparing five tools to define perceptions

L W Andrews, P Daniels, A G Hall

    Ostomy/Wound Management
    |June 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Common variation at 12q24.13 (OAS3) influences chronic lymphocytic leukemia risk.

    Leukemia·2014
    Same author

    Development and validation of a 3ABC antibody ELISA in Australia for foot and mouth disease.

    Australian veterinary journal·2014
    Same author

    Predictors of major bleeding in peri-procedural anticoagulation management.

    Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2011
    Same author

    The connection between water and energy in cities: a review.

    Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research·2011
    Same author

    The 2007 outbreak of equine influenza in Australia: lessons learned for international trade in horses.

    Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)·2011
    Same author

    Diagnosis of equine influenza virus infections in quarantine stations in Australia, 2007.

    Australian veterinary journal·2011
    Same journal

    A Descriptive, Qualitative Study to Explore the Pain Experience During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Postsurgical Abdominal Wounds.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    Cultivating Incontinence-associated Dermatitis Prevention Practices in an Australian Local Health District: A Quasi-experimental Study.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    Early and Late Closure of Loop Ileostomies: A Retrospective Comparative Outcomes Analysis.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    A Retrospective, Descriptive Analysis of Hospital-acquired Deep Tissue Injuries.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    Outcomes of a Quality Improvement Program to Reduce Hospital-acquired Pressure Ulcers in Pediatric Patients.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    Effect of Music Therapy on Pain Perception, Anxiety, and Opioid Use During Dressing Change Among Patients With Burns in India: A Quasi-experimental, Cross-over Pilot Study.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    See all related articles

    This study evaluated five tools for measuring patient and nurse caring perceptions. The Wolf

    Area of Science:

    • Nursing
    • Healthcare Research
    • Patient Experience

    Background:

    • Assessing perceptions of caring attributes is crucial in nursing research.
    • Existing measurement tools vary in their suitability for patient and nurse populations.
    • Standardized and validated instruments are needed to reliably capture caring perceptions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the usefulness of five distinct tools in measuring perceptions of caring attributes among patients and nurses.
    • To identify the most effective instrument for research studies involving patient and nurse populations.
    • To evaluate practical aspects of tool administration and data analysis.

    Main Methods:

    • A convenience sample of 26 nurse administrators completed five different caring attribute measurement tools: Larson's Care Q, Larson's Care/Sat, Nyberg's CAS, Duffy's CAT, and Wolf's CBI.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Data collected included tool completion time, demographic characteristics, and comparison of results with prior research.
  • Qualitative assessments of ease of use, clarity of instructions, and data analysis complexity were performed.

    • Main Results:

    • Larson's Care Q yielded similar results to previous studies but was time-consuming and had a forced-choice format.
    • Larson's Care/Sat was quick to complete but difficult to analyze and contained negatively worded items.
    • Nyberg's CAS and Duffy's CAT presented challenges, with the former being nurse-specific and the latter having negatively worded items.
    • Wolf's CBI demonstrated consistent language, ease of understanding, efficient completion time, and straightforward analysis, aligning with previous findings.

    Conclusions:

    • Both Larson's Care Q, with simplified administration, and Wolf's CBI are potentially valuable for measuring caring perceptions in patients and nurses.
    • Wolf's CBI offers practical advantages in terms of administration time, clarity, and analysis.
    • Further research may refine the administration of Larson's Care Q for broader applicability.