Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

ABR slow wave and stimulus duration

S J Barry1, E K Barry

  • 1Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Audiology and Speech Pathology Section, Augusta, Georgia 30904-6285, USA.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can Bone Conduction Thresholds Really Be Poorer Than Air?

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Role of hypothalamic-pituitary axis in EGF action on maturation of adrenal gland in fetal rhesus monkey in vivo.

Pediatric research·2001
Same author

Effects of 2-G exposure on temperature regulation, circadian rhythms, and adiposity in UCP2/3 transgenic mice.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2000
Same author

Gene-environment interaction: a significant diet-dependent obesity locus demonstrated in a congenic segment on mouse chromosome 7.

Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society·1999
Same author

Age, geographic, and temporal distribution of fecal shedding of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in cow-calf herds.

American journal of veterinary research·1999
Same author

Morphologic changes and xanthine oxidase activity in the equine jejunum during low flow ischemia and reperfusion.

American journal of veterinary research·1998
Same journal

Psychometric Rigor Before Clinical or Research Implementation.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

American Academy of Audiology Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification for Adults with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review Protocol.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Evidence Synthesis and Open Science: A Tutorial for Systematic Reviews and Beyond in Audiology Research.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

State and Trait Anxiety Alter Postural Control in Healthy Adults.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Differentiating Superior and Inferior Vestibular Neuritis: Insights from an Integrated VEMP and vHIT Assessment.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Test-Retest Reliability of the Triangle Completion Test.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
See all related articles

The auditory brainstem response

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Audiology
  • Auditory Evoked Potentials

Background:

  • The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a key electrophysiological measure in audiology.
  • Temporal integration (TI) describes how the auditory system processes sound duration.
  • The slow wave (SW) component of ABR offers insights into auditory processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the slow wave (SW) component of the auditory brainstem response (ABR).
  • To examine the effect of stimulus duration on ABR SW and wave V.
  • To evaluate the utility of ABR SW in audiological assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded ABR in eight normal-hearing adults using 500- and 2000-Hz tone bursts.
  • Varied stimulus durations from 2.5 to 44 msec with specific ramp/decay.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed composite waveforms for SW and wave V amplitude and latency changes.

    • Main Results:

    • Composite ABR waveforms showed significant increases in amplitude and latency with stimulus duration at 2000 Hz.
    • This effect was not observed at 500 Hz.
    • Responses included contributions from both SW and wave V.

    Conclusions:

    • Stimulus duration significantly impacts ABR SW and wave V at 2000 Hz, but not 500 Hz.
    • ABR SW shows potential advantages for audiological testing.
    • Further research can enhance the detectability of short-latency auditory evoked responses.