Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical indicators in colorectal surgery

G A Thompson1, J R Cocks, B T Collopy

  • 1Victorian State Committee, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Melbourne, Australia.

Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice
|March 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Randomised clinical study: GR-MD-02, a galectin-3 inhibitor, vs. placebo in patients having non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with advanced fibrosis.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2016
Same author

Ether-containing lipids of the slime mold,Physarum polycephalum: I. Characterization and quantification.

Lipids·2016
Same author

Ether-containing lipids of the slime mold,Physarum polycephalum: II. Rates of biosynthesis.

Lipids·2016
Same author

Search for a two-Higgs-boson doublet using a simplified model in pp collisions at sqrt[s] = 1.96 TeV.

Physical review letters·2014
Same author

Family-centred music therapy to promote social engagement in young children with severe autism spectrum disorder: a randomized controlled study.

Child: care, health and development·2013
Same author

Increased 5-enolpyruvylshikimic acid 3-phosphate synthase activity in a glyphosate-tolerant variant strain of tomato cells.

Plant cell reports·2013
Same journal

Phenomenon of quality and health-care.

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
Same journal

Aspects of the Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme.

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
Same journal

Rational prescribing for childhood pneumonia.

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
Same journal

Quality management and the Emergency Services Enhancement Program.

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
Same journal

Eradicating Helicobacter pylori in patients with a past history of peptic ulcer: is the juice worth the squeeze?

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
Same journal

Ensuring accuracy of clinical data is only part of the audit process.

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
See all related articles

Two Victorian studies identified key indicators for colorectal cancer resection. Wound infection, anastomotic leak, and mortality in patients under 80 are suggested as appropriate clinical indicators for this procedure.

Area of Science:

  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Surgical Quality Indicators
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Clinical indicators are crucial for assessing the quality of colorectal cancer resection.
  • Previous studies have proposed thresholds for these indicators, but validation is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate potential clinical indicators and their thresholds for colorectal carcinoma resection with anastomosis.
  • To compare study findings with existing suggested indicator thresholds.

Main Methods:

  • Two independent studies were conducted in Victoria, involving a total of 535 patients.
  • One study was hospital-based, and the other was surgeon-based.
  • Data on clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Threshold figures for draft indicators were found to be similar to the study data.
  • Wound infection (elective operation without stoma formation) was identified as a key indicator.
  • Clinically recognized anastomotic leak and mortality (elective operations in patients <80 years) were also highlighted.

Conclusions:

  • Wound infection, anastomotic leak, and mortality in specific patient groups are suggested as the most appropriate clinical indicators for colorectal resection.
  • These findings support the use of validated indicators to monitor and improve surgical quality in colorectal cancer care.