Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measured electron energy and angular distributions from clinical accelerators

J O Deasy1, P R Almond, M T McEllistrem

  • 1James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, Kentucky 40202, USA. jodeasy@roentgen.bcc.louisville.edu

Medical Physics
|May 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"Primer shot" fractionation with an early treatment break is theoretically superior to consecutive weekday fractionation schemes for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2023
Same author

Temporal patterns of patient-reported trismus and associated mouth-opening distances in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: A prospective cohort study.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2017
Same author

Influence of image slice thickness on rectal dose-response relationships following radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Physics in medicine and biology·2014
Same author

Modelling the interplay between hypoxia and proliferation in radiotherapy tumour response.

Physics in medicine and biology·2013
Same author

Collective structure in 94Zr and subshell effects in shape coexistence.

Physical review letters·2013
Same author

Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes.

Pattern recognition·2010

Electron energy spectra and angular distributions were measured for scanning beam and scattering foil linear accelerators. Scanning beam machines showed Gaussian spectra and narrower angular spreads compared to scattering foil types.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Accelerator Physics

Background:

  • Clinical linear accelerators (LINACs) are crucial for radiation therapy.
  • Understanding electron beam characteristics is vital for accurate dose delivery.
  • Two common LINAC beam delivery methods are scanning beam and scattering foil.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To measure and compare electron energy spectra and angular distributions from scanning beam and scattering foil LINACs.
  • To characterize beam properties at the isocenter (patient plane).
  • To investigate discrepancies in angular spread measurements compared to previous studies.

Main Methods:

  • Magnetic spectrometer techniques were employed to measure electron energy spectra and angular distributions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measurements were conducted at the isocenter, 1 meter from the source, in air.
  • Focus was on central axis electrons, neglecting widely scattered particles.
  • Main Results:

    • Scanning beam LINACs exhibited nearly Gaussian energy spectra with a Full-Width-at-Half-Maximum (FWHM) of ~5% of the peak energy.
    • Scattering foil LINACs showed varied spectra, including double peaks, with FWHM ranging from 9%-22%.
    • Angular spreads (sigma theta x * E0) were approximately 295 mrad-MeV for scanning beam and 346 mrad-MeV for scattering foil machines.

    Conclusions:

    • Scanning beam machines offer more consistent and narrower energy spectra compared to scattering foil machines.
    • Measured angular spreads for both machine types were notably smaller than previously reported values using the penumbra method.
    • Further investigation is needed to explain the observed differences in angular spread measurements.