Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The lanolin paradox

R Wolf1

  • 1Maccabee Dermatologic Outpatient Clinic, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.

Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Lanolin causes allergic reactions in therapeutic products but is safe in cosmetics. Standard patch tests for lanolin allergy are unreliable, showing frequent false results.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Smoking can be good for you.

Journal of cosmetic dermatology·2006
Same author

Influence of cassette type on the DQE of CR systems.

Medical physics·2006
Same author

Effects of dipeptidyl peptidase IV on the satiety actions of peptide YY.

Diabetologia·2006
Same author

Caudate blood flow and volume are reduced in HIV+ neurocognitively impaired patients.

Neurology·2006
Same author

An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for pediatric radiology.

Medical physics·2006
Same author

Impetigo herpetiformis with hyperparathyroidism.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2005
Same journal

Mpox Outbreaks Beyond Historically Endemic Regions: A Clinical Review of Vaccination Strategies and Public Health Challenges.

Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Clinical Insights and Prognostic Factors in Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia and Lichen Planopilaris: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Descriptive Analysis of DRESS Reports from EudraVigilance and DRESS Cases from the RegiSCAR-project.

Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

The Role of the Vagus Nerve and Its Stimulation in Modulating Inflammatory Skin Diseases and Other Dermatologic Conditions: From Mechanisms to Therapeutics.

Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Skin Barrier Dysfunction, Antimicrobial Peptide Alterations, and Microbiome Changes in Solid Cancer Patients Treated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors.

Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

PASI Training via Virtual Reality Application - new way of effective teaching.

Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Allergology
  • Cosmetic Science

Background:

  • Lanolin is a common ingredient in both therapeutic topical agents and cosmetics.
  • Paradoxical reactions to lanolin, termed 'lanolin paradoxes,' have been observed.
  • Patients sensitized to lanolin in medications may tolerate it in cosmetics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the puzzling aspects of lanolin use, referred to as 'lanolin paradoxes.'
  • To highlight the discrepancy in lanolin's sensitization potential between therapeutic agents and cosmetics.
  • To evaluate the reliability of standard patch testing for diagnosing lanolin allergy.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of clinical observations and case studies.
  • Analogy drawn with established 'paraben paradoxes.'

Related Experiment Videos

  • Critique of standard patch testing protocols for lanolin allergy.

    • Main Results:

    • Lanolin in topical therapeutics sensitizes a significant number of patients.
    • The same lanolin is generally safe and well-tolerated in widely used cosmetic products.
    • Individuals with confirmed lanolin allergy may exhibit false-negative patch test reactions to unaltered lanolin.
    • Standard patch testing with 30% wool wax alcohols is unreliable, yielding both false-positive and false-negative results.

    Conclusions:

    • The diagnostic accuracy of standard patch testing for lanolin allergy is questionable.
    • Further investigation into reliable methods for detecting lanolin hypersensitivity is warranted.
    • The differing clinical outcomes of lanolin exposure in therapeutic versus cosmetic contexts require further understanding.