Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intervention research: GAO experiences

P G Grasso1

  • 1Program Evaluation and Methodology Division, U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, DC 20548, USA.

American Journal of Industrial Medicine
|April 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Need of a partner on home peritoneal dialysis (HPD): incidence and an alternative choice.

Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysisยท1989
See all related articles

This study introduces program evaluation tools for occupational health and safety interventions. It highlights data collection and analysis methods, emphasizing the need for a clear intervention theory for effective research.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Program Evaluation
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Effective research on occupational health and safety interventions requires robust evaluation tools.
  • Previous studies often lack a clear theoretical framework for intervention impact.
  • The U.S. General Accounting Office has conducted relevant program evaluations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe program evaluation tools applicable to occupational health and safety intervention research.
  • To illustrate data collection and analysis techniques through case studies.
  • To emphasize the critical role of intervention theory in research design and interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of extant data from existing studies.
  • Synthesis of findings from previously published research.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Integration of data from administrative records and surveys.
  • Development of a theoretical framework for intervention impact.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstrated utility of diverse data collection and analysis techniques.
    • Provided examples of applying evaluation tools in real-world settings.
    • Highlighted the challenges and importance of establishing intervention theories.

    Conclusions:

    • Program evaluation tools can significantly enhance occupational health and safety intervention research.
    • A well-defined intervention theory is crucial for guiding data collection and interpreting results.
    • Combining multiple data sources and analytical approaches strengthens research validity.