Genetic testing and early diagnosis and intervention: boon or burden?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2026

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 23, 2011
1Queensland Bioethics Centre, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract:
The possibility of early diagnosis and intervention is radically changed by the advent of genetic testing. The recent report of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics is timely and helpful. I have suggested, that not only the severity of the disability indicated by genetic information, and the accuracy of the data, ought to govern the approach to the implementation of screening for genetic disorders. In addition, assessment of the value of the information to those involved should be considered. The efficacy of the available therapeutic measures, combined with the prognostic data are important indices of the value of the information. These measures fall into three categories and thus indicate that three different courses of intervention may be appropriate. Three approaches to diagnosis and intervention are then outlined, drawing on the experience of various clinical initiatives.
More Related Videos
09:16Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
Published on: February 21, 2015
08:22A Novel Strategy Combining Array-CGH, Whole-exome Sequencing and In Utero Electroporation in Rodents to Identify Causative Genes for Brain Malformations
Published on: December 1, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
What is Genetic Engineering?
Gene Therapy
Pedigree Analysis
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...