Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cervical assessment: visual or digital?

M A Morgan1, M de Veciana, P J Rumney

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, USA.

Journal of Perinatology : Official Journal of the California Perinatal Association
|March 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An effective approach to tackling complex health policy challenges. Using a clinical microsystems approach and rethinking codesign.

Frontiers in public health·2024
Same author

Final report on serial phase II trials of all-intraperitoneal chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for women with newly diagnosed, optimally cytoreduced carcinoma of Müllerian origin.

Gynecologic oncology·2019
Same author

Continent versus incontinent diversion for obstetric fistula.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2017
Same author

Chronic B-Cell Malignancies in Patients with Lymphocytosis.

Leukemia & lymphoma·2016
Same author

The effects of umbilical cord milking in extremely preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2013
Same author

Comparison of testing approaches for Clostridium difficile infection at a large community hospital.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2013

Visual cervical assessment is not equivalent to digital exams in laboring patients. Visual exams underestimate cervical dilation and effacement, with clinical significance noted above 3 cm dilation.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Clinical Assessment
  • Labor and Delivery

Background:

  • Accurate cervical assessment is crucial for labor management.
  • Digital and visual methods are commonly used but their agreement is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy and agreement between visual and digital cervical examinations in patients experiencing uterine contractions.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study of 133 gravid women at ≥27 weeks' gestation in early labor.
  • Blinded, randomized comparison of visual (speculum) and digital cervical exams for dilation and effacement.
  • Data analyzed using correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman tests.

Main Results:

  • Visual assessment underestimated cervical dilation by 0.60 cm and effacement by 14.2%.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Wide limits of agreement were observed for both dilation (-2.06 to 3.25 cm) and effacement (-41.3% to 69.9%).
  • Discrepancies were clinically significant when cervical dilation exceeded 3 cm.

    • Conclusions:

    • Visual cervical assessment is not equivalent to digital examination in women with uterine contractions.
    • The findings suggest caution when relying solely on visual assessment, particularly in advanced labor stages.
    • Digital examination remains the preferred method for accurate cervical assessment during labor.