Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What do anxiety scales measure?

P Keedwell1, R P Snaith

  • 1St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
|March 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers often use anxiety assessment instruments without understanding what they measure. A review found these scales assess different psychopathology areas, necessitating a re-evaluation of their assumed shared construct.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Are we really mapping psychosis risk? Neuroanatomical signature of affective disorders in subjects at ultra high risk.

Psychological medicine·2014
Same author

Neural markers of symptomatic improvement during antidepressant therapy in severe depression: subgenual cingulate and visual cortical responses to sad, but not happy, facial stimuli are correlated with changes in symptom score.

Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2008
Same author

An enquiry into recurrent brief depressive episodes in the general population.

European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists·2000
Same author

Antipsychotic polypharmacy and early death.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·1999
Same author

A businessman drinking 18 units a day.

The Practitioner·1999
Same author

[German version of the Snaith-Hamilton-Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-D). Anhedonia in schizophrenic and depressive patients].

Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie·1998

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Psychiatry
  • Measurement in Health

Background:

  • Current research frequently utilizes instruments for anxiety assessment.
  • There is a lack of critical evaluation regarding the specific constructs these instruments measure.
  • This reliance on unexamined instruments may lead to inaccurate research findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey frequently used anxiety rating scales.
  • To examine the alignment of scale items with major aspects of anxiety.
  • To highlight the need for greater precision in anxiety measurement.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic survey of prevalent anxiety rating scales was conducted.
  • Items within each scale were analyzed and categorized according to the aspects of anxiety they purportedly assess.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of item allocation across different scales was performed.

    • Main Results:

    • The analyzed anxiety rating scales were found to measure disparate areas of psychopathology.
    • Significant variation exists in the constructs targeted by different anxiety assessment tools.
    • The assumption that these scales measure a uniform anxiety construct is not supported.

    Conclusions:

    • Further research necessitates a more critical examination of anxiety assessment instruments.
    • The assumption that all anxiety scales measure the same construct should be abandoned.
    • Future studies must carefully consider the specific nature and scope of each instrument used for anxiety assessment.