Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic versus lumboscopic nephrectomy

B Guillonneau1, P Ballanger, P M Lugagne

  • 1Centre Médico-Chirurgical de la Porte de Choisy, Paris; France.

European Urology
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2017
Same author

[PET/CT and biochemical recurrence of prostate adenocarcinoma: Added value of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 when <sup>18</sup>F-fluorocholine is non-contributive].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2017
Same author

[Partial nephrectomy on solitary kidney: Renal function outcome and predictive factors of impairment].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2015
Same author

[Not Available].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2015
Same author

[Not Available].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2015
Same author

[Not Available].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2015
Same journal

Re: McKay RR, Pal S, Xie W, et al. Advanced Urologic Cancer Consensus Conference (AUC3) 2025: Expert Consensus on the Management of Renal Cell and Urinary Tract Cancers. CA Cancer J Clin 2026;76:e70052.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: Ultra-hypofractionated Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: 5-year Outcomes from a Pooled Analysis of the FASTRACK Trials.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: Alexander D. Sherry, Van To, Criselle D'souza, et al. Metastasis-directed Therapy With or Without Pembrolizumab for Oligometastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Pooled Analysis of Two Prospective Single-arm Phase 2 Trials. Eur Urol. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2026.03.024.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: Hormone Therapy Use and Duration with Postoperative Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: an Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: Nguyen DD, Tadayon Najafabadi B, Lin L, et al. Effect of Prostate Cancer Screening with Prostate-specific Antigen Testing on Long-term Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2026.04.005.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Histological Subtypes and Divergent Differentiation of Urothelial Carcinoma: Histology, Genomics, and Management Implications.

European urology·2026
See all related articles

Retroperitoneal laparoscopy (lumboscopy) offers a shorter operating time for nephrectomy compared to transperitoneal laparoscopy. Initial results show similar morbidity and hospital stay for both laparoscopic nephrectomy techniques.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Techniques

Background:

  • Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a standard minimally invasive procedure.
  • Two primary laparoscopic approaches exist: transperitoneal and retroperitoneal (lumboscopy).
  • Comparing initial experiences with these techniques is crucial for surgical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the initial outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopy versus retroperitoneal laparoscopy (lumboscopy) for nephrectomy.
  • To evaluate operative time, complications, and hospital stay in the early experience of two urologic centers.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study of the first 20 laparoscopic nephrectomies at two centers.
  • 10 cases utilized transperitoneal laparoscopy, and 10 cases used retroperitoneal laparoscopy (lumboscopy).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Patient demographics, indications for nephrectomy, and surgical techniques were recorded.

    • Main Results:

    • Mean operative time was significantly shorter for lumboscopy (173 min) than transperitoneal laparoscopy (210 min).
    • No severe intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported; one hematoma occurred in the laparoscopic group.
    • Mean postoperative hospital stay was similar for both techniques (4.3 days for lumboscopy, 4.2 days for laparoscopy).

    Conclusions:

    • Both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic approaches are viable for nephrectomy.
    • Lumboscopy demonstrated a shorter operative time in this initial experience.
    • Further research on conversion rates is needed to fully differentiate the techniques.