Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Semantic and spatial components of selective attention

V J Dark1, K G Vochatzer, B A Van Voorhis

  • 1Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011-3180, USA. vjdark@iastate.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|February 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conceptual activation of distractors during selection is not sufficient to produce negative priming.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2000
Same author

Flanker recall and the flanker validity effect may reflect different attentional processes.

Perception & psychophysics·1999
Same author

Perceptual implicit memory requires attentional encoding.

Memory & cognition·1999
Same author

Attentional processing of "unattended" flankers: evidence for a failure of selective attention.

Perception & psychophysics·1998
Same author

Do abrupt-onset peripheral cues attract attention automatically?

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·1992
Same author

Switching between memory and perception: moving attention or memory retrieval?

Memory & cognition·1990
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Selective attention involves both semantic priming and spatial location. These two factors, semantic selectivity and spatial selectivity, appear to be controlled by separate attentional mechanisms, influencing word processing.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • Selective attention allows individuals to process relevant information while ignoring distractions.
  • Understanding the mechanisms of selective attention is crucial for explaining cognitive processing.
  • Previous research suggests both semantic and spatial factors influence attentional selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interplay between semantic and spatial effects on selective attention.
  • To determine if semantic priming and spatial location rely on separate attentional mechanisms.
  • To examine how different prime durations and cueing affect selective word processing.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using masked word pairs presented after a prime word.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Varying prime durations (250 ms, 1,000 ms) and peripheral cueing (50 ms, 100 ms) were employed.
  • Participants reported one or both words from the pair, with analysis focusing on reported words and their relation to primes and cues.

    • Main Results:

    • Semantic selectivity (processing related words) and spatial selectivity (processing top words) were observed.
    • Peripheral cues enhanced processing, particularly at longer delays (1,000 ms), showing an additive benefit.
    • Task demands influenced selectivity, with cued word reporting enhanced by cues, especially with longer delays and shorter cue durations.

    Conclusions:

    • Selective attention operates through distinct mechanisms for semantic priming and spatial location.
    • Both semantic and spatial factors independently influence the efficiency of information processing.
    • Attentional mechanisms can be modulated by prime duration, cueing, and task requirements.