Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Velocity encoding using ghost artifacts

B Madore1, R M Henkelman

  • 1Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|June 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial for "Saturated Multi-Delay Renal Arterial Spin Labeling Technique at 5 T MR: A Comparative Study With 3 T".

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2025
Same author

Multiple-mouse magnetic resonance imaging with cryogenic radiofrequency probes for evaluation of brain development.

NeuroImage·2022
Same author

Kctd13-deficient mice display short-term memory impairment and sex-dependent genetic interactions.

Human molecular genetics·2018
Same author

Spatial gene expression analysis of neuroanatomical differences in mouse models.

NeuroImage·2017
Same author

Integration of accelerated MRI and post-processing software: a promising method for studies of knee osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2016
Same author

Zebrafish models of idiopathic scoliosis link cerebrospinal fluid flow defects to spine curvature.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2016
Same journal

A Comparison of Tissue Property Values Estimated Using Conventional Cardiac MRF and MT-Cardiac MRF.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Dependence of the Extra-Cellular Diffusion Coefficient on the Fractions of Neurites and Cell Bodies in Gray Matter.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Triple-Pulse <sup>23</sup>Na MRI Sequence (TriNa) for Simultaneous Acquisition of Spin-Density-Weighted and Fluid-Attenuated Images.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Phantom Doping Materials in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Design of an 8-Channel Transmit 32-Channel Receive 11.7T Head Coil and Evaluation of SNR Gains.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

The Potential for Absolute Temperature Imaging Based on Brain Metabolites Using an FID-Shifting Approach in Gradient Echo Planar Spectroscopic Imaging (GREPSI).

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study uses deliberate motion artifacts in MRI to encode velocity information faster. By superposing ghosting artifacts, velocity is encoded in both magnitude and phase using fewer images.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Physics

Background:

  • Motion artifacts are a major challenge in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
  • Existing methods for motion artifact correction are often insufficient or complex.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel method for faster velocity encoding in MRI.
  • To utilize motion artifacts, rather than suppress them, for encoding flow information.

Main Methods:

  • Deliberately created motion artifacts (ghosting) to encode velocity.
  • Superposition of ghosting artifacts of different orders.
  • Retrieval of 2D complex intensity and velocity information from two images.

Main Results:

  • Velocity information encoded in both image phase and magnitude.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Reduced number of required images from three to two for velocity measurement.
  • Achieved faster velocity-encoding process.
  • Conclusions:

    • Motion artifacts can be repurposed as a tool for efficient velocity encoding in MRI.
    • This technique offers a faster alternative for flow imaging at the cost of increased equation complexity and reduced signal-to-noise ratio.