Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developmental toxicity risk assessment: consensus building, hypothesis formulation, and focused research

C A Kimmel1

  • 1National Center for Environmental Assessment (8602), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460, USA.

Drug Metabolism Reviews
|February 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accounting for susceptibility in risk assessment: current practice and new directions.

Environmental toxicology and pharmacology·2011
Same author

Overview of teratology.

Current protocols in toxicology·2010
Same author

Response-surface analysis of exposure-duration relationships: the effects of hyperthermia on embryonic development of the rat in vitro.

Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology·2002
Same author

Enalapril: pharmacokinetic/dynamic inferences for comparative developmental toxicity. A review.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2002
Same author

Developmental stage sensitivity and mode of action information for androgen agonists and antagonists.

The Science of the total environment·2001
Same author

Recent developments in regulatory requirements for developmental toxicology.

Toxicology letters·2001

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines have advanced developmental toxicity risk assessment by standardizing methods and promoting research. Continued international collaboration is key to improving these assessments and preventing adverse developmental effects.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Toxicology
  • Risk Assessment Science

Background:

  • Developmental toxicity risk assessment has evolved significantly, with the latest U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines established in 1991.
  • Expert consensus on interpreting developmental toxicity data has strengthened the scientific foundation for risk assessment, including default assumptions for data gaps.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the impact and evolution of EPA's developmental toxicity risk assessment guidelines.
  • To highlight research areas and advancements that improve risk assessment methodologies.
  • To emphasize the role of these guidelines in standardizing terminology and influencing testing protocols.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical EPA guidelines and their impact on risk assessment practices.
  • Analysis of research initiatives focusing on mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, and biomarkers of developmental toxicity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the influence of guidelines on national and international harmonization efforts.

    • Main Results:

    • EPA guidelines have standardized terminology and influenced testing guidelines, including developmental neurotoxicity.
    • Research has focused on dose-related mechanisms, pharmacokinetic modeling, and biomarkers.
    • Guidelines have fostered international harmonization through collaborations with WHO, IPCS, and OECD.

    Conclusions:

    • The EPA's developmental toxicity risk assessment guidelines have been instrumental in advancing the field.
    • Ongoing research and international cooperation are crucial for refining risk assessment and preventing developmental toxicity.
    • Future efforts should focus on improving current approaches to avoid over-reliance on outdated default methods.