Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intralist interference in recognition memory

K Kim1, M Glanzer

  • 1Department of Psychology, New York University, New York 10003, USA.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|September 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of small dose of brotizolam on P300.

Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2001
Same author

Melatonin treatment for circadian rhythm sleep disorders.

Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2001
Same author

An overview of group sequential methods in longitudinal clinical trials.

Statistical methods in medical research·2001
Same author

Determination of floral fragrances of Rosa hybrida using solid-phase trapping-solvent extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Journal of chromatography. A·2001
Same author

Effects of background noise on audiometric thresholds during positron emission tomography: passive and active noise-reduction.

Scandinavian audiology·2001
Same author

Evidence for direct involvement of beta-catenin in phorbol ester-induced neurite outgrowth in GT1-1 hypothalamic neurones.

Journal of neuroendocrinology·2001
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Intralist interference in recognition memory is primarily influenced by test order, not study order. This finding clarifies how item presentation affects memory recall accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Intralist interference effects in recognition memory are not fully understood.
  • Previous research suggested combined study and test order effects, alongside speed-accuracy trade-offs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To precisely define the nature of intralist interference effects in recognition memory.
  • To differentiate between study (input) and test (output) order effects.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted three experiments investigating recognition memory.
  • Manipulated study and test orders, and analyzed speed-accuracy trade-off effects.
  • Controlled for response times in final experiments.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Study order effects were found to be ineffective in influencing recognition memory.
  • Test order effects were consistently demonstrated as significant.
  • The test order effect persisted even when response times were controlled.

Conclusions:

  • Recognition memory interference is predominantly driven by the order of items during testing, not during study.
  • Attention/likelihood theory was applied to explain the observed test order interference effect.