Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Design issues in cohort studies

R L Prentice1

  • 1Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reviews cohort study design, focusing on factors influencing power and choices in population selection, size, and follow-up. It highlights how confounding and measurement errors impact analysis reliability.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Competing risks and multivariate outcomes in epidemiological and clinical trial research.

Lifetime data analysis·2024
Same author

The renin-angiotensin aldosterone system and osteoporosis: findings from the Women's Health Initiative.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2019
Same author

Higher Dimensional Clayton-Oakes Models for Multivariate Failure Time Data.

Biometrika·2016
Same author

Reliable evidence from placebo-controlled, randomized, clinical trials for menopausal hormone therapy's influence on incidence and deaths from breast cancer.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2015
Same author

Self-Consistent Nonparametric Maximum Likelihood Estimator of the Bivariate Survivor Function.

Biometrika·2015
Same author

Incidence of milk alkali syndrome in the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and cohort study: response to Neupane.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2013
Same journal

Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A robust neural network with random effects for subject-specific prediction of clustered count data.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A comparison of methods for designing hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized trials with continuous effectiveness and implementation endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Cohort studies are a fundamental observational research design.
  • Relative risk estimation is a key analytical procedure in cohort studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review basic features of cohort studies.
  • To examine factors influencing cohort study power and design choices.
  • To discuss the role of cohort studies in the broader research landscape.

Main Methods:

  • Review of fundamental cohort study features.
  • Discussion of relative risk estimation.
  • Analysis of factors impacting study power.
  • Examination of design choices (population, size, follow-up, ascertainment, subsampling).

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Confounding and measurement error significantly influence precision and reliability.
  • Design choices critically affect cohort study outcomes.
  • Cohort studies play a distinct role alongside other research strategies.

Conclusions:

  • Careful consideration of design elements is crucial for robust cohort studies.
  • Understanding and mitigating confounding and measurement error are essential.
  • Cohort studies offer unique insights when appropriately designed and analyzed.