Related Experiment Videos

Auditory-evoked response morphology in profoundly-involved multi-handicapped children: comparisons with normal

G Cottrell1, D Gans

  • 1University of Wisconsin-River Falls, USA.

Insights

Auditory brainstem response (ABR) and middle-latency response (MLR) in multi-handicapped children showed significant differences compared to normal development. These findings support the difference/defect theory in auditory development.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Audiology

Background:

  • Auditory development in multi-handicapped children is often explained by developmental or difference/defect theories.
  • Evoked potentials from the central auditory nervous system may reveal developmental influences in these children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare auditory-evoked potential waveform morphology between profoundly multi-handicapped children and normal infants/children.
  • Investigate if developmental factors impact auditory response behaviors in multi-handicapped individuals.

Main Methods:

  • Examined auditory brainstem response (ABR) and middle-latency response (MLR) morphology.
  • Analyzed waveform descriptions, wave detection, latency, amplitude, and spectral energy.
  • Compared handicapped subjects with normal infants and children.

Main Results:

  • The majority of multi-handicapped subjects displayed ABR/MLR morphology distinct from normal controls.
  • Handicapped children exhibited depressed responses and considerable waveform variability.
  • Observed differences suggest atypical auditory processing in the studied population.

Conclusions:

  • The study's findings support the difference/defect theory of auditory development.
  • Evoked potential measures indicate significant deviations in the central auditory nervous system of multi-handicapped children.
  • Further research is warranted to understand the specific nature of these auditory processing differences.

Related Concept Videos