Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multiple comparisons procedures for comparing several treatments with a control based on binary data

C Chuang-Stein1, D M Tong

  • 1Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI 49001, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|December 15, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Yu and Tong Reply.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Krylov Shadow Tomography: Efficient Estimation of Quantum Fisher Information.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Inferring Physical Properties of Symmetric States from the Fewest Copies.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Evolution Operator Can Always Be Separated into the Product of Holonomy and Dynamic Operators.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Selection bias for treatments with positive Phase 2 results.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2020
Same author

Recent Developments in the Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2018
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study compares three statistical methods for analyzing binary treatment data. Dunnett

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Methods
  • Clinical Trial Analysis

Background:

  • Comparing multiple treatments to a control is crucial in research.
  • Binary response data is common in clinical and biological studies.
  • Accurate statistical methods are needed to control Type I error rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate three distinct statistical approaches for comparing multiple treatments against a control using binary data.
  • To assess the Type I error rates and power of each method.
  • To provide recommendations for selecting the most appropriate method based on study design and desired error control.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Freeman-Tukey transformation with asymptotic theory.
  • Employed an acceptance region based on binomial distributions under joint null hypotheses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applied Dunnett's procedure adapted for binary data.
  • Evaluated Type I error rates via simulation and binomial calculations.

    • Main Results:

    • Assessed the overall Type I error rates for Freeman-Tukey, binomial, and Dunnett's procedures.
    • Compared the performance of the three methods in maintaining the desired Type I error rate.
    • Investigated the statistical power of each approach.

    Conclusions:

    • Provided recommendations on choosing among the Freeman-Tukey, binomial, and Dunnett's procedures based on their Type I error control.
    • Offered insights into the power characteristics of each method for different scenarios.
    • Aimed to guide researchers in selecting optimal statistical strategies for binary outcome data analysis.