Related Experiment Videos
Covert orienting to non-informative cues: reaction time studies
1Dipartimento di Scienze, Università di Verona, Italy. GTASSI@BORGOROMA.UNIVR.IT
Behavioural Brain Research
|November 1, 1995
Summary
Non-informative visual cues slow reaction time (RT) to subsequent targets. This inhibition involves sensory and attentional components, suggesting covert orienting mechanisms across different spaces.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Psychology
- Visual Attention
Background:
- Lateralized, non-informative visual cues can influence reaction time (RT) to successive targets.
- Early facilitation in RT is observed only when cues and targets co-occur.
- Inhibition from visual cues has both sensory and attentional components, with attentional effects being spatially lateralized.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the mechanisms underlying reaction time inhibition induced by lateralized, non-informative cues.
- To explore the role of voluntary suppression of orienting in motor readiness.
- To determine if similar covert orienting mechanisms operate across different spatial extents and modalities.
Main Methods:
- Review of studies examining reaction time (RT) to targets following lateralized visual, somatic, or auditory cues.
- Analysis of intramodal (e.g., visual-visual) and cross-modal (e.g., visual-somatic) cue-target interactions.
- Examination of the spatial constraints of attentional components of inhibition.
Main Results:
- Non-informative visual cues lengthen RT to targets in the same visual field.
- Sensory inhibition components are independent of orienting, while attentional components are lateralized.
- Inhibition effects are observed across visual, somatic, and auditory modalities, and in cross-modal interactions.
- Covert orienting mechanisms appear to operate across peripersonal and near extrapersonal space.
Conclusions:
- Directional constraints in motor readiness, induced by suppressing overt orienting, best explain the observed RT effects.
- Covert orienting mechanisms are consistent across peripersonal and near extrapersonal space.
- A common neural substrate likely underlies both intramodal and cross-modal attentional effects.