Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Phylogenies and comparative data, a microevolutionary perspective

E P Martins1

  • 1Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403, USA.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
|July 29, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Increased chromosome damage in systemic sclerosis skin fibroblasts.

Scandinavian journal of rheumatology·2010
Same author

A comparative study of the evolution of sceloporus push-up displays.

The American naturalist·2009
Same author

Citrullinated filaggrin is decreased in oral keratinocytes in rheumatoid arthritis.

Clinical and experimental rheumatology·2006
Same author

Individual, sexual, seasonal, and temporal variation in the amount of sagebrush lizard scent marks.

Journal of chemical ecology·2006
Same author

Random sampling of constrained phylogenies: conducting phylogenetic analyses when the phylogeny is partially known.

Systematic biology·2002
Same journal

The microlandscapes of tree trunks: the effect of lichen and tree-level characteristics on arthropod communities.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Centimetre-scale landscapes to assess the motion behaviour and cognition of gastropods and bivalves.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Intertidal microcosms of wave-swept rocky shores: ecological and physiological insights from a uniquely stressful environment.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Temporal and spatial variation in temperature and oxygen at the microscale: key niche axes for aquatic life.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Natural microcosms in ecology: fulfilling the promise of model systems?

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Microbe-induced galls and plant defence: metabolite crosstalk in a co-evolutionary battle.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

This study presents a framework to link macroevolutionary patterns with microevolutionary processes. It aids in comparing phylogenetic reconstruction, data correction, and inferring evolutionary details from species data.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Phylogenetics
  • Quantitative genetics

Background:

  • Species phenotypes diverge during evolution along phylogenetic trees.
  • Closely related species often share phenotypic similarities due to common ancestry.
  • The extent of phenotypic similarity is influenced by phylogeny and accumulated evolutionary changes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a general framework for translating between macroevolutionary patterns and microevolutionary processes.
  • To compare methods for phylogenetic reconstruction, comparative data correction, and microevolutionary inference.
  • To explore new applications for phylogenies and comparative data analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Reviewing a general framework to connect macroevolutionary patterns with microevolutionary processes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing observed species phenotype relationships with expected structures based on phylogeny and evolutionary models.
  • Utilizing the framework to evaluate methods for phylogeny reconstruction, phylogenetic non-independence correction, and microevolutionary inference.

    • Main Results:

    • The framework facilitates the translation between macroevolutionary patterns and microevolutionary processes.
    • It allows for the comparison of different methods used in phylogenetic and evolutionary analyses.
    • The framework enables the inference of microevolutionary details from interspecific data and phylogenies.

    Conclusions:

    • A microevolutionary perspective enhances the analysis of interspecific data.
    • The presented framework opens new avenues for research in evolutionary biology.
    • This approach offers novel uses for phylogenies and comparative data in understanding evolutionary history.