Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
The risk of stroke in the early postoperative period following mitral valve replacement
T A Orszulak1, H V Schaff, J R Pluth
1Section of Cardiovascular Surgery and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic/Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Insights
Mitral valve replacement (MVR) with Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis shows 5-year survival rates of 62.7% for MVR alone and 50.1% for MVR with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Stroke risk is higher in older, compromised patients, necessitating aggressive early anticoagulation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Bioprosthetic Heart Valves
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Mitral valve replacement (MVR) using bioprosthetic valves is a common cardiac procedure.
- Understanding long-term outcomes, including survival and stroke risk, is crucial for patient management.
- The Carpentier-Edwards (C-E) bioprosthesis is frequently utilized in MVR procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term survival and stroke rates in patients undergoing MVR with C-E bioprosthesis.
- To identify preoperative and operative factors influencing survival and stroke risk after MVR.
- To assess the impact of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on MVR outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 285 patients undergoing MVR with C-E bioprosthesis +/- CABG.
- Analysis of patient demographics, operative variables, and clinical outcomes (survival, stroke).
- Statistical analysis to identify significant predictors of adverse events.
Main Results:
- Five-year survival rates were 62.7% for MVR and 50.1% for MVR+CABG.
- Adverse survival factors included NYHA class IV, age >= 70, low ejection fraction (<56%), and combined MVR+CABG.
- Five-year freedom from stroke was 89.2%; advanced heart class was the primary stroke risk factor.
Conclusions:
- Late survival after MVR with C-E bioprosthesis is influenced by patient's preoperative condition and surgical complexity.
- Stroke risk is highest early postoperatively and associated with patient's cardiac compromise.
- Aggressive early anticoagulation strategies are recommended to mitigate stroke risk.
Abstract:
All patients (285) undergoing mitral valve replacement (MVR) with a Carpentier-Edwards (C-E) bioprosthesis +/- coronary bypass grafts (CABG) were reviewed (109 men and 176 women with a median age of 70 years). Overall, the 5-year survival rate was 58.9%, 62.7% for MVR (199 patients) and 50.1% for MVR+CABG (86 patients). Late survival was adversely affected by the operative time variables of NYHA class IV, older (> or = 70 years) age, low (> or = 56%) ejection fraction (EF), and the additional performance of associated procedures+CABG with MVR (P < or = 0.001). The 5-year freedom from stroke rate was 89.2%, 89.1% for MVR and 90.2% for MVR +/- CABG. Advanced heart class was the only significant variable associated with a greater risk of late stroke (P < or = 0.01). Neither chronic preoperative atrial fibrillation nor operative obliteration of the left atrial appendage increased or decreased the late risk of stroke in patients following MVR. Hazard function for stroke occurring in the first postoperative year (first 48 h excluded to discount intraoperative events) demonstrated the highest rate within the first month (40%), rapidly diminishing thereafter. This pattern was reproduced in the 12-year hazard function in that the rate of stroke occurrence was greatest in the first year (6.7%) following implantation. The mean stroke rate over 12 years was 2.5%. Strokes following MVR +/- CABG are more likely to occur in older and more compromised patients, and the higher early rate is not reflected in the mean rate. A more aggressive approach to early anticoagulation with IV heparin, Coumadin, and possibly antiplatelet therapy is advocated to reduce this complication rate.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management

