Related Experiment Videos
A comparative study of one implant versus two replacing a single molar
T J Balshi1, R E Hernandez, M C Pryszlak
1Prosthodontics Intermadica, Institute for Factal Esthetics, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania 19034, USA.
Summary
This study found that while both one and two Brånemark implants for molars have a high 3-year success rate (99%), two implants significantly reduce mechanical complications like screw loosening compared to single implants.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Biomaterials Science
- Prosthodontics
Background:
- Single molar replacement with dental implants is a common procedure.
- Brånemark implants are widely used for tooth replacement.
- Understanding the long-term biomechanical stability and success rates of single versus multiple implants is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes and biomechanical stability of single versus two Brånemark implants used to replace a single molar.
- To evaluate success rates, marginal bone loss, and complication frequencies over a 3-year period.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 47 patients, with 22 receiving one implant and 25 receiving two implants for single molar replacement.
- Monitoring of implant success rate, marginal bone loss, Sulcus Bleeding Index, and prosthesis complications over 3 years.
- Analysis of occlusal contact and biomechanical support.
Main Results:
- A 3-year cumulative success rate of 99% was observed for both groups.
- Marginal bone loss was slightly higher in the two-implant group (0.24 mm) compared to the single-implant group (0.10 mm).
- Prosthesis mobility or screw loosening was significantly more frequent in the single-implant group (48%) than in the two-implant group (8%).
Conclusions:
- Implant-supported molars demonstrate high success rates, with two implants offering superior mechanical stability and reduced complication rates.
- While single implants show high survival, addressing mechanical issues like screw loosening is important, potentially through improved abutment designs.
- The findings support biomechanical analyses suggesting two implants provide more advantageous support than one for molar replacement.