[Electric treatment of atrial fibrillation]

In the present manuscript the information concerning electrical therapy of atrial fibrillation (AF) to prevent its development and to control its consequences (excluding ablation which will be covered in separate manuscripts of this series) is reviewed. Both presently conventional approaches and those undergoing investigation will be considered, under three general headings. Electrical stimulation to prevent the development of AF. Based on non controlled studies comparing VVI stimulation with other modalities that include stimulation of the atria, it was suggested that atrial stimulation could prevent AF recurrences in patients with sinus node dysfunction. This concept has been questioned in recent studies. In contrast, the hypothesis that specific ways of atrial stimulation (stimulation at sites other than the high right atrium, multisite simultaneous or with certain "delays" atrial stimulation) may be more efficacious is presently under enthusiastic assessment. Electrical stimulation to control ventricular response. Despite the evidence that ventricular stimulation may contribute to regularization and rate control during AF, its quantitative value seems to be scarce and, thus, is not of regular use in practice. Automatic implantable atrial defibrillator. Both animal experiments and clinical studies have demonstrated that the atria can be defibrillated using intracavitary electrodes with less than 3 joules in most cases, and without risk of inducing ventricular tachyarrhythmias as long as shocks are synchronized to the R wave and the preceding R-R interval is not short. Although an implantable atrial defibrillator is already undergoing clinical evaluation, the subject of tolerability of patients to shocks for non malignant arrhythmias is still controversial, since even low energy shocks seem to be painful.