Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimation of risks due to environmental carcinogenesis

M F Cranmer

    Medical and Pediatric Oncology
    |January 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary

    Quantifying human exposure risks from carcinogens requires improved detection and risk assessment methods. Better risk-benefit analysis is crucial for effective environmental protection strategies and regulatory enforcement.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    SYSTEMATIC SIGNIFICANCE OF LUPINE ALKALOIDS WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO BAPTISIA (LEGUMINOSAE).

    Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
    Same author

    Determination of DDT and metabolites, including DDA, in human urine by gas chromatography.

    Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology·2013
    Same author

    Carbaryl. A toxicological review and risk analysis.

    Neurotoxicology·1986
    Same author

    Prenatal chlordane exposure: effects on plasma corticosterone concentrations over the lifespan of mice.

    Environmental research·1984
    Same author

    Trimethyltin induced changes of neurotransmitter levels and brain receptor binding in the mouse.

    Neurotoxicology·1983
    Same author

    Immunoteratology of chlordane: cell-mediated and humoral immune responses in adult mice exposed in utero.

    Toxicology and applied pharmacology·1982

    Area of Science:

    • Environmental Health
    • Toxicology
    • Risk Assessment

    Background:

    • Multiple federal agencies regulate carcinogen exposure, impacting environmental factors.
    • Achieving absolute safety is impossible; enhanced protection is attainable through improved risk management.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the need for better methods to detect and quantify relative risk from carcinogen exposure.
    • To compare the effectiveness of different laws and regulations in controlling specific carcinogens.
    • To discuss improvements in toxicological methods for risk estimation.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of existing laws and regulations for carcinogen control.
    • Analysis of toxicological, epidemiological, and mathematical models for risk estimation.
    • Case studies examining exposures to DDT, aflatoxinb1, DES, and benzidine.

    Main Results:

    • Current models for estimating risk are often inexact.
    • Different laws and regulations have varying impacts on controlling specific agents.
    • There is a significant need for improved quantification of relative risk.

    Conclusions:

    • Enhanced methods for detecting and quantifying carcinogen exposure risks are urgently needed.
    • Resource allocation should prioritize maximum overall effect based on quantified risks.
    • Reasonable comparison of risk and benefit necessitates quantified relative risk assessment.

    Related Experiment Videos