Related Experiment Videos
Palliative medicine: a new specialty changes an old debate
1Postgraduate Medical School, University of Exceter, UK.
British Medical Bulletin
|April 1, 1996
Summary
Palliative care addresses needs of patients with advanced progressive diseases. Arguments for euthanasia based on compassion or autonomy are critically examined and found insufficient.
Area of Science:
- Medical Specialties
- Geriatrics
- Oncology
Background:
- Palliative care has evolved from hospice principles.
- It addresses multifaceted needs of patients with advanced, incurable, progressive diseases.
- Specialist palliative care is accessible across various settings (home, hospital, hospice) and is cost-effective.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the role and accessibility of palliative care.
- To critically examine common arguments advocating for euthanasia in chronic disease.
- To assess the ethical and practical underpinnings of end-of-life care discussions.
Main Methods:
- Review of palliative care principles and accessibility.
- Ethical analysis of arguments for euthanasia.
- Examination of existing medical practices related to end-of-life care.
Main Results:
- Palliative care is a developed specialty meeting diverse patient needs.
- Specialist palliative care is not prohibitively expensive and widely available.
- Arguments favoring euthanasia (compassion, autonomy, perceived hypocrisy) lack robust justification upon examination.
Conclusions:
- Palliative care offers a comprehensive approach to managing advanced progressive diseases.
- The ethical and practical justifications for euthanasia are found wanting.
- Further consideration of palliative care's role in end-of-life decision-making is warranted.
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia